Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 15 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 is discontinued — replaced by Hankook Dynapro HT RH12. Compare Dynapro HT RH12 with Ecopia EP422
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 vs Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 15 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro AS RH03 leads, 57–55 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 3 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
Dynapro AS RH03 +456Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Dynapro AS RH03 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 44 49 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 52
Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
56
Wet
Dynapro AS RH03 +157Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Dynapro AS RH03 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 51 53 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 56
Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 57
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
55
Snow
Level55Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Dynapro AS RH03 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 46 45 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 45.8 = 55
Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 55
No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
56
Comfort
Dynapro AS RH03 +359Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Dynapro AS RH03 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 44 48 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 56
Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 59
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP422 or Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Noise
Ecopia EP422 +161Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Dynapro AS RH03 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 55 51 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 62
Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 61
No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP422 or Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Treadwear
Dynapro AS RH03 +260Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Dynapro AS RH03 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 52 56 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 58
Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
43
Handling (owners)
Dynapro AS RH03 +649Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Dynapro AS RH03 Reviews found online 43 49
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 57 |
| Dry | 52 | 56 |
| Wet | 56 | 57 |
| Snow | 55 | 55 |
| Comfort | 56 | 59 |
| Noise | 62 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 43 | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP422
Dynapro AS RH03
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | B · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 6 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 480 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 — better handling, dry and comfort. Where the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 scores 49 vs 43 on handling.
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 scores 56 vs 52 on dry.
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 scores 59 vs 56 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP422 or Dynapro AS RH03?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP422 or Dynapro AS RH03?
Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 57 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP422 or Dynapro AS RH03?
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03, 56 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP422 or Dynapro AS RH03?
Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 55 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Ecopia EP422 or Dynapro AS RH03?
Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 61 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP422 or Dynapro AS RH03?
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03, 59 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP422 or Dynapro AS RH03?
Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 60 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology