Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 15 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 32 road tests and 15 + 21,600 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 88–57
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 87 · 32 tests Owners 87 · 21,600 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)
“I have the 235 that is a little higher load rating (105 vs 103 stock and 99 for 225). I'm probably getting about a 10% range reduction, but worth it to me for the improved handling and lower braking distance. I work from home and I charge to 90% about once a week unless taking a longer drive. If I did a lot of longer trips it might be an issue, but I am very happy with these tires.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
56
Dry
CrossClimate 2 +3995Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 30 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 99 Reviews found online 49 89 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.1 + 40% × 88.5 = 95
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
58
Wet
CrossClimate 2 +2987Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 30 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 54 92 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 58
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.4 + 40% × 91.8 = 87
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Snow
CrossClimate 2 +3691Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 99 Reviews found online 46 78 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 55
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.9 + 40% × 78.4 = 91
No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
54
Comfort
CrossClimate 2 +2478Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 46 87 Ecopia EP422: 40% × 65 (est.) + 60% × 46.4 = 54
CrossClimate 2: 40% × 65.1 + 60% × 86.5 = 78
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP422. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Noise
CrossClimate 2 +1780Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 57 83 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.2 = 63
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 82.7 = 80
No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP422. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Treadwear
CrossClimate 2 +2383Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 56 87 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 60
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.1 + 40% × 87 = 83
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison82Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 CrossClimate 2 Reviews found online – 82 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison90Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests – 90
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 88 |
| Dry | 56 | 95 |
| Wet | 58 | 87 |
| Snow | 55 | 91 |
| Comfort | 54 | 78 |
| Noise | 63 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 83 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 82 |
| Efficiency | – | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ecopia EP422
CrossClimate 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP422
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B CrossClimate 2
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
- Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
- Long-lasting tread wear and durability
Cons
- Higher initial purchase price
- Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
- Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin CrossClimate 2
The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.
“Michelin CrossClimate2 efficiency surprisingly good! Just put in a new set of Michelin CrossClimate2s to go along with a move from LA to New England. I was a bit worried about the mileage/range hit but figured the safety in the winter outweighed it. I'm pleasantly surprised! On an all-highway trip from Boston to New Jersey, gas MPG was a steady 42 mpgs and I got about 45 miles on the battery, although I drive like a grandma at the posted speed limits so I think I was close to 44 mpg/45 EV miles on the old OEM tires. Around town in suburbia in good weather I'm still running between 4.0-5.0 miles/kWh. I estimate, at worst, a 5% drop in efficiency. Pretty good considering the Michelins feel so much stickier!”
“My Official review of the Cross Climate 2 tires. I put some new shoes on the Outback after reading some threads on here and decided with my weather here in Missouri the Cross Climate 2s were the best fit. In rain, they are great so no more sliding or hydroplaning what so ever. In snow, they are even more amazing. They grip extremely well. The one downside to them that concerns me, and I didn't think about this when I purchased them, is that fact you can't do a full tire rotation to them like conventional tires as they are directional so you can only do front to back and vise versa. For this reason I am concerned if I will get 60K out of them and avoid the inner/outer wear. Sure you can dismount the tire from the wheel and remount them but I had heard that's bad for them. Overall, they are excellent. If you are concerned about the tire rotation thing, I would say the Michelin Defenders or the Falkan Wildpeaks are probably a better bet. I plan on getting the Falkans next but hopefully that wont be for at least 50K more miles. Read more”
“On a 2015 Highlander Hybrid, the CC2 is excellent anti-hydroplaning, wonderful snow and ice handling, both moving and stopping. I am a rideshare driver averaging 200 or so miles per day. The tires are only just now a bit noisier at 78,000 miles. Wear is down to 3/32 and went through a wild, heavy rain storm today with no lack of confidence whatsoever. Only downside is that >80 degrees F and gas mileage goes down by 2 mpg. Love the tires so much that I feel the slight loss during summer is still worth it.”
Based on 762 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 6 | 92 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 480 A A | 640 B A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better dry, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 56 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 91 vs 55 on snow.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 87 vs 58 on wet.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 78 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP422 or CrossClimate 2?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP422 or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP422 or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP422 or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 91 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Ecopia EP422 or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 80 vs 63 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP422 or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 78 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP422 or CrossClimate 2?
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 83 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology