Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 15 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 15 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 79–57
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 83 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Defender LTX M/S +2479Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 48 84 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 55
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 84.3 = 79
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
58
Wet
Defender LTX M/S +2482Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 79 (est.) Reviews found online 53 86 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 78.8 (est.) + 40% × 85.6 = 82
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Snow
Defender LTX M/S +1974Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 45 77 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 55
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 74
No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
53
Comfort
Defender LTX M/S +2275Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 45 78 Ecopia EP422: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.3 = 53
Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.7 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
63
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 57 – Ecopia EP422: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 63
No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP422. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Treadwear
Defender LTX M/S +2080Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 56 86 Ecopia EP422: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 60
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 86.3 = 80
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison82Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Defender LTX M/S Reviews found online – 82
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 79 |
| Dry | 55 | 79 |
| Wet | 58 | 82 |
| Snow | 55 | 74 |
| Comfort | 53 | 75 |
| Noise | 63 | – |
| Treadwear | 60 | 80 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ecopia EP422
Defender LTX M/S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP422
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Defender LTX M/S
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, often exceeding 60,000 miles
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride quality
- Strong traction and secure handling in wet, dry, and moderate snow conditions
Cons
- High initial purchase price compared to competitors
- Subpar off-road performance, specifically struggling in mud, sand, and loose gravel
- Limited ice performance compared to dedicated winter tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 6 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 480 A A | 720 - 800 B A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better dry, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 55 on dry.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 58 on wet.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 75 vs 53 on comfort.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 80 vs 60 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP422 or Defender LTX M/S?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP422 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 82 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP422 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP422 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 74 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP422 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP422 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 80 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology