Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Bridgestone Ecopia EP600 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 1 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners 80 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 EV Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison76Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 70 Reviews found online – 83 BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83.4 = 76
-
–
Wet
No comparison74Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 68 Reviews found online – 83 BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 83.2 = 74
-
–
Comfort
No comparison67Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 65 Reviews found online – 69 BluEarth XT AE61: 40% × 64.7 + 60% × 69.2 = 67
-
–
Noise
No comparison79Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 87 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 79
No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth XT AE61. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison62Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 53 Reviews found online – 77 BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 76.5 = 62
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison82Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Reviews found online – 82 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison65Why this score
Source Ecopia EP600 BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP600 | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 73 |
| Dry | – | 76 |
| Wet | – | 74 |
| Comfort | – | 67 |
| Noise | – | 79 |
| Treadwear | – | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 82 |
| Efficiency | – | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP600
BluEarth XT AE61
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP600
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B BluEarth XT AE61
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP600 | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 2 | 38 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ | 16″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP600
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Only Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology