Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 10 + 2 road tests and 39 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Primacy 4+ is ahead, 78–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Primacy 4+
Tire AMichelin

Primacy 4+

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 10 tests Owners 70 · 39 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth XT AE61

Summer

± 8

Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners 80 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 EV Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 78

    Dry

    Primacy 4+ +2
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 2 tests8270
    Reviews found online7183
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%92%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%98%

    Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.3 + 40% × 70.5 = 78

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83.4 = 76

  2. 79

    Wet

    Primacy 4+ +5
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 2 tests8368
    Reviews found online7483
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–086%85%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–082%80%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–091%88%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%98%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–195%96%

    Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.6 + 40% × 73.8 = 79

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 83.2 = 74

  3. 71

    Comfort

    Primacy 4+ +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests7365
    Reviews found online6969
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–088%75%

    Primacy 4+: 40% × 73.3 + 60% × 69 = 71

    BluEarth XT AE61: 40% × 64.7 + 60% × 69.2 = 67

  4. 73

    Noise

    BluEarth XT AE61 +6
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 2 tests7787
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%100%

    Primacy 4+: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 79

    No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4+ or BluEarth XT AE61. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 85

    Treadwear

    Primacy 4+ +23
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests9553
    Reviews found online6977
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–092%62%

    Primacy 4+: 60% × 95.3 + 40% × 68.9 = 85

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 76.5 = 62

  6. 65

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth XT AE61 +17
    82
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+BluEarth XT AE61
    Reviews found online6582
  7. 78

    Efficiency

    Primacy 4+ +13
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4+BluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 1 tests7865
    Range (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–092%91%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–090%77%
Scores at a glance
Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Primacy 4+Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Relative Score 78 72
Dry 78 76
Wet 79 74
Comfort 71 67
Noise 73 79
Treadwear 85 62
Handling (owners) 65 82
Efficiency 78 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Primacy 4+

± 8

BluEarth XT AE61

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Michelin Primacy 4+ finished ahead 1 times and Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryPrimacy 4+BluEarth XT AE61ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% 92% +3.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Dry Handling Dry 98% 98% +0.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 86% 85% +0.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 82% 80% +2.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Wet Braking Wet 91% 88% +3.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Wet Circle Wet 97% 98% −1.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Wet Handling Wet 95% 96% −1.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 88% 75% +12.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Noise Noise 97% 100% −3.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Wear Treadwear 92% 62% +29.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Range Efficiency 92% 91% +1.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 90% 77% +12.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #5/8 #8/8 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Value Cost 67% 70% −3.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #4/8 #7/8 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Primacy 4+

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and a smooth, compliant 'limousine-like' feel over bumps
  • Strong and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions, inspiring confidence
  • Noticeable improvement in quietness and traction compared to predecessor tires or factory options

Cons

  • Loud road noise and a harsh drone on rough or coarse asphalt surfaces
  • Soft sidewalls can reduce steering agility and initial responsiveness compared to dedicated sport tires
  • High premium price point relative to competitors
All owner themes in the Primacy 4+ review

Tire B BluEarth XT AE61

Pros

  • Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Responsive and sharp steering handling
  • High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction

Cons

  • Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
  • Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
  • Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
All owner themes in the BluEarth XT AE61 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Primacy 4+ B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available6638
Rim diameters16″ – 21″16″ – 20″
Sizes in common2727

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Primacy 4+

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

Winner: Michelin Primacy 4+ — better treadwear, efficiency and wet. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 if handling and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 85 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 82 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 78 vs 65 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 79 vs 73 on noise.

Tire A · Michelin Primacy 4+
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Primacy 4+ or BluEarth XT AE61?

Which is better in the wet, Primacy 4+ or BluEarth XT AE61?

Michelin Primacy 4+, 79 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Primacy 4+ or BluEarth XT AE61?

Neither, by our numbers: 78 vs 76 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Primacy 4+ or BluEarth XT AE61?

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61, 79 vs 73 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Primacy 4+ or BluEarth XT AE61?

Michelin Primacy 4+, 71 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Primacy 4+ or BluEarth XT AE61?

Michelin Primacy 4+, 85 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Primacy 4+ or BluEarth XT AE61?

Michelin Primacy 4+, 78 vs 65 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology