tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 2 road tests and 786 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

EfficientGrip 2 SUV is ahead, 80–72

Check price on Amazon · EfficientGrip 2 SUV or BluEarth XT AE61 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Tire AGoodyear

EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Summer

± 5

Tests 81 · 5 tests Owners 79 · 786 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (noise)

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth XT AE61

Summer

± 8

Tests 65 · 2 tests Owners 80 · 12 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 EV Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 79

    Dry

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVBluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests7770
    Reviews found online8183
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–094%93%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–099%98%
    Driving Performance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%87%

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 77 + 40% × 81.4 = 79

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 83.4 = 75

  2. 80

    Wet

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVBluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests8167
    Reviews found online7983
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–094%81%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–093%86%
    Wet Lateral Stability (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%98%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–093%89%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%98%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–098%97%

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 81.4 + 40% × 78.9 = 80

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 83.3 = 74

  3. 76

    Comfort

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVBluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests7964
    Reviews found online7469
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–196%88%

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 40% × 79 + 60% × 73.7 = 76

    BluEarth XT AE61: 40% × 64.4 + 60% × 69.4 = 67

  4. 82

    Noise

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +4
    78
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVBluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests9386
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%100%
    Exterior Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0100%100%

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 92.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 82

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 86.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 78

    No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip 2 SUV or BluEarth XT AE61. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 81

    Treadwear

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +18
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVBluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests8253
    Reviews found online8077
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%62%

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 80 = 81

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 53.3 + 40% × 77 = 63

  6. 76

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth XT AE61 +6
    82
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVBluEarth XT AE61
    Reviews found online7682
  7. 75

    Efficiency

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip 2 SUVBluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests7565
    Range (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–091%91%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–082%77%
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUVYokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Relative Score 80 72
Dry 79 75
Wet 80 74
Comfort 76 67
Noise 82 78
Treadwear 81 63
Handling (owners) 76 82
Efficiency 75 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

EfficientGrip 2 SUV

± 8

BluEarth XT AE61

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV finished ahead 2 times and Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryEfficientGrip 2 SUVBluEarth XT AE61ΔHead-to-head
Driving Performance Dry 96% 87% +9.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 · 215/60R17
Dry Braking Dry 94% 93% +1.3 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Dry Handling Dry 99% 98% +1.3 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 94% 81% +13.3 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 93% 86% +7.3 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Wet Braking Wet 93% 89% +4.1 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Wet Circle Wet 97% 98% −1.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Wet Handling Wet 98% 97% +1.5 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Wet Lateral Stability Wet 100% 98% +2.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 · 215/60R17
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 96% 88% +8.5 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Exterior Noise Noise 100% 100% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 · 215/60R17
Noise Noise 98% 100% −1.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Wear Treadwear 100% 62% +38.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Range Efficiency 91% 91% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 82% 77% +4.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #1/8 #8/8 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Value Cost 92% 70% +21.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #3/8 #7/8 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 EV Tyre Test · 215/55 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong and confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Impressive tread wear and long-term durability

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can compromise responsive handling and cornering feedback
  • Less effective performance in cold, freezing, or damp winter conditions
  • Lack of built-in rim protection
All owner themes in the EfficientGrip 2 SUV review

Tire B BluEarth XT AE61

Pros

  • Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Responsive and sharp steering handling
  • High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction

Cons

  • Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
  • Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
  • Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
All owner themes in the BluEarth XT AE61 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4138
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 20″
Sizes in common1717

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV — better treadwear, efficiency and comfort. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 81 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 75 vs 65 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 76 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 80 vs 74 on wet.

Tire A · Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EfficientGrip 2 SUV or BluEarth XT AE61?

Which is better in the wet, EfficientGrip 2 SUV or BluEarth XT AE61?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 80 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EfficientGrip 2 SUV or BluEarth XT AE61?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 79 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, EfficientGrip 2 SUV or BluEarth XT AE61?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 82 vs 78 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EfficientGrip 2 SUV or BluEarth XT AE61?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 76 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EfficientGrip 2 SUV or BluEarth XT AE61?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 81 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EfficientGrip 2 SUV or BluEarth XT AE61?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 75 vs 65 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology