Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 41 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus vs Kumho 758 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
758 is ahead, 62–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
Level57Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus 758 Reviews found online 51 52 -
60
Wet
758 +464Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus 758 Reviews found online 57 62 -
61
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus 758 Reviews found online 55 – -
60
Comfort
758 +262Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus 758 Reviews found online 51 55 -
61
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus 758 Reviews found online 54 – -
56
Treadwear
758 +1369Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus 758 Reviews found online 49 71 -
47
Handling
758 +1158Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus 758 Reviews found online 47 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus | Kumho 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 62 |
| Dry | 57 | 57 |
| Wet | 60 | 64 |
| Snow | 61 | – |
| Comfort | 60 | 62 |
| Noise | 61 | – |
| Treadwear | 56 | 69 |
| Handling | 47 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
758
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B 758
Pros
- Strong handling and braking performance on both wet and dry surfaces
- Excellent water drainage
- Exceptional tread longevity
Cons
- Noticeable road noise
- Subpar ride comfort
- Inconsistent user experience regarding refinement
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus | B · Kumho 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 19 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Kumho 758
Winner: Kumho 758 — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho 758 scores 69 vs 56 on treadwear.
Kumho 758 scores 58 vs 47 on handling.
Kumho 758 scores 64 vs 60 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.