Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 24 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 76–71
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 13 tests Owners 74 · 2,495 reviews
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +780Why this score
Source Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 83 Reviews found online 76 76 -
72
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +678Why this score
Source Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 80 Reviews found online 73 76 -
70
Comfort
Level70Why this score
Source Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 70 71 -
–
Noise
No comparison63Why this score
Source Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 61 -
66
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +773Why this score
Source Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 76 Reviews found online 66 69 -
78
Handling
Potenza Adrenalin RE004 +474Why this score
Source Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 78 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 76 |
| Dry | 73 | 80 |
| Wet | 72 | 78 |
| Comfort | 70 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 63 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 73 |
| Handling | 78 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Potenza Adrenalin RE004
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza Adrenalin RE004
Pros
- Exceptional steering precision and turn-in response due to a stiff sidewall construction.
- Strong dry-weather grip and stability during high-speed cornering.
- Significant improvement in wet-weather performance compared to the previous RE003 generation.
Cons
- Inconsistent reports on road noise, with some users finding it intrusive at highway speeds.
- Polarized feedback on tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear under aggressive driving.
- Stiffer sidewall can lead to a harsher ride quality on poor road surfaces for some vehicles.
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
“Top top top guma, stavio prosle godine kad sam kupio auto, odmah na Kupres isao, snijega i leda bilo dosta, ali izdale me nisu Imam i ljetne hankook ventus prime 4 isto odlicna guma”
“Aim for rainy condition. Best are 1.Bridgestone Turanza 005 2.Hankook ventus prime 4.”
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better dry, treadwear and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 if handling matters most to you.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 80 vs 73 on dry.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 73 vs 66 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 78 vs 72 on wet.
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 scores 78 vs 74 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.