tirewheelguide

Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 37 road tests and 8 + 10,323 owner reviews. How we score

Turanza T005 is ahead, 73–58

Check price on Amazon · Turanza T005 or Potenza RE030 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Turanza T005
Tire BBridgestone

Turanza T005

Summer

Tests 76 · 37 tests Owners 64 · 10,323 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“Are these needing replacement? - Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT (Run Flat) BMW G20 Not sure if I should be replacing these yet they seem close to the wear bar, rather be safe than sorry and to ask here especially with Uk/Irish weather 😅 Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Turanza T005 +17
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Turanza T005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 34 tests≈ 63 (est.)84
    Reviews found online5564

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59

    Turanza T005: 60% × 84.1 + 40% × 64.2 = 76

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 56

    Wet

    Turanza T005 +23
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Turanza T005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 35 tests≈ 59 (est.)85
    Reviews found online5170

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56

    Turanza T005: 60% × 84.8 + 40% × 70.4 = 79

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 56

    Comfort

    Turanza T005 +13
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Turanza T005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 65 (est.)73
    Reviews found online4363

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56

    Turanza T005: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 62.7 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    47
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Turanza T005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests–36
    Reviews found online–64

    Turanza T005: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 64 = 47

  5. 67

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE030 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Turanza T005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 67 (est.)71
    Reviews found online6957

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67

    Turanza T005: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 56.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 49

    Handling (owners)

    Turanza T005 +16
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Turanza T005
    Reviews found online4965
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE030Bridgestone Turanza T005
Relative Score 58 73
Dry 59 76
Wet 56 79
Comfort 56 69
Noise – 47
Treadwear 67 65
Handling (owners) 49 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE030

Turanza T005

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE030

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Reliable and consistent dry road grip
  • Strong, stiff sidewall construction

Cons

  • High levels of cabin road noise
  • Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
  • Tendency toward understeer
All owner themes in the Potenza RE030 review

Tire B Turanza T005

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and short braking distances in rain
  • Improved fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Confident, stable handling at highway speeds

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear and shorter overall lifespan reported by many users
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback and lack of precision during spirited cornering
  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking over time
All owner themes in the Turanza T005 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE030

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Mixed

Community opinions on the Bridgestone Turanza T005 are divided, with many drivers praising its wet-weather grip and highway usability. Conversely, numerous owners report significant concerns regarding loud road noise, rough ride comfort, rapid wear, and premature sidewall cracking or dry rot.

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2023-01-22

“Turanza T005 Hello, I bought a Seat Leon Cupra equipped with BRIDGESTONE TURANZA T005 XL in 225/40/18 92Y. I join you the card of the tire in attachment. It is the manufacturer model 13011. On the BRIDGESTONE website, there is a PDF with the list of all TURANZA models that I attach to this post. You can find the characteristics of the model 13011. Only here is one of my tires is damaged, and I would like to change it by the same model. First of all I can't find it on the online retailers. In fact, I can find references that look exactly the same. But there are some extra words that I don't understand. The abbreviations WAR/REP in the Trade Category column mean what exactly? I found the reference 8836 (or 13187) for example which corresponds in all points but the abbreviation REP is affixed in addition on the PDF. Please help me to find this information.”
goingelectric.de ·2020-06-01

“For more detailed information and a projection of the consumption advantage based on an example: Below is the link to the EU regulation on tire labeling and the information from the Michelin homepage for comparison with other efficient tires: ... 0740&rid=1 Group C1 is listed in the regulation as: A: <=6.5 kg/t B: 6.7 to 7.7 kg/t C: 7.8 to 9 kg/t The Bridgestone EP500 is in class B Use the following formula to calculate the consumption advantage: F_ROLL:g*M*CR = rolling resistance in J/m For kWh/100km: F_Rolll*100000/3600 Example based on my 120ah REX Bridgestone EP500/Turanza T005 (7.17 kg/t and 5.81 kg/t respectively) 9.81*1465*0.00717=103.0 J/m = 2.86 kWh/100km 9.81*1465*0.00581=83.5 J/m = 2.32 kWh/100km Michelin e Primacy (5.58 kg/t and 5.13 kg/t respectively) 9.81*1465*0.00558=83.4 J/m = 2.32 kWh/100km 9.81*1465*0.00513=73.7 J/m = 2.05 kWh/100km Reduction of 0.55 kWh/100km for new tires Reduction of 0.27 kWh/100km for worn tires For me, that was reason enough to choose this one”
bimmerfest.com ·2020-09-20

“Only issue is possible ride quality with higher pressure. Dealer and independents seem to universally recommend going higher on tire pressures to maximize tire life for even wear on BMWs. I have been lectured on it a couple times at a locally respected suspension/alignment specialist over the years.”
Top themes
#wet weather grip#road noise and comfort#sidewall cracking dry rot#tread wear life#tire pressure sensitivity#oem tire replacement

Based on 33 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 B · Bridgestone Turanza T005
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—140
Rim diameters—14″ – 22″
UTQG—340 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE030

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T005 — better wet, dry and handling. Where the Bridgestone Potenza RE030 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 79 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 76 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 65 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 69 vs 56 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Turanza T005
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE030 or Turanza T005?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or Turanza T005?

Bridgestone Turanza T005, 79 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or Turanza T005?

Bridgestone Turanza T005, 76 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or Turanza T005?

Bridgestone Turanza T005, 69 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or Turanza T005?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology