Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Continental Premium Contact 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 8 + 119 owner reviews. How we score
Premium Contact 5 is ahead, 70–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 64 · 119 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Premium Contact 5 +1271Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Premium Contact 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 55 70 Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59
Premium Contact 5: 60% × 71 + 40% × 70 = 71
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
56
Wet
Premium Contact 5 +2076Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Premium Contact 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 51 73 Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56
Premium Contact 5: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 72.5 = 76
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
56
Comfort
Premium Contact 5 +1571Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Premium Contact 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 43 66 Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56
Premium Contact 5: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 66.3 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison71Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Premium Contact 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 73 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Premium Contact 5: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of noise for Premium Contact 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
67
Treadwear
Potenza RE030 +760Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Premium Contact 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 69 48 Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67
Premium Contact 5: 60% × 68.7 + 40% × 48 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
49
Handling (owners)
Premium Contact 5 +1867Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Premium Contact 5 Reviews found online 49 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | Continental Premium Contact 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 70 |
| Dry | 59 | 71 |
| Wet | 56 | 76 |
| Comfort | 56 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza RE030
Premium Contact 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE030
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Reliable and consistent dry road grip
- Strong, stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- High levels of cabin road noise
- Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
- Tendency toward understeer
Tire B Premium Contact 5
Pros
- Exceptional grip in both wet and dry road conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and low cabin noise
- Predictable and safe handling characteristics
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and body roll
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | B · Continental Premium Contact 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 23 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 17″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Continental Premium Contact 5
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 5 — better wet, handling and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE030 if treadwear matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental Premium Contact 5 scores 76 vs 56 on wet.
Continental Premium Contact 5 scores 67 vs 49 on handling.
Continental Premium Contact 5 scores 71 vs 56 on comfort.
Continental Premium Contact 5 scores 71 vs 59 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE030 or Premium Contact 5?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or Premium Contact 5?
Continental Premium Contact 5, 76 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or Premium Contact 5?
Continental Premium Contact 5, 71 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or Premium Contact 5?
Continental Premium Contact 5, 71 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or Premium Contact 5?
Bridgestone Potenza RE030, 67 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology