Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 63 · 119 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 42 road tests and 119 + 2,358 owner reviews. How we score
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 80–69
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 63 · 119 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,358 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 39 tests | 71 | 88 |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 78 |
Premium Contact 5: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 70.9 = 71
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.7 + 40% × 78 = 84
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 40 tests | 79 | 88 |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 80 |
Premium Contact 5: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 73.5 = 77
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 80.4 = 85
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 77 |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 10 tests | 74 | 80 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 71 |
Premium Contact 5: 40% × 74.2 + 60% × 65.6 = 69
PremiumContact 6: 40% × 80.4 + 60% × 70.8 = 75
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 22 tests | 73 | 43 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 73 |
Premium Contact 5: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43.1 + 40% × 72.5 = 55
No owner ratings of noise for Premium Contact 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests | 69 | 88 |
| Reviews found online | 43 | 65 |
Premium Contact 5: 60% × 68.7 + 40% × 43.4 = 59
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 65 = 79
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 67 | 77 |
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 25 tests | 67 | 74 |
| Category | Continental Premium Contact 5 | Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 80 |
| Dry | 71 | 84 |
| Wet | 77 | 85 |
| Snow | – | 74 |
| Comfort | 69 | 75 |
| Noise | 70 | 55 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 77 |
| Efficiency | 67 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Premium Contact 5
PremiumContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Premium Contact 5 | PremiumContact 6 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #6/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #8/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/10 · 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 78% #8/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 80% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% #6/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 93% #29/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% #4/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #5/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 97% #5/10 · 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 80% #5/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 89% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 90% #2/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 98% #2/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 99% #6/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 100% #4/10 · 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 77% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 70% #6/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 93% #6/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 77% #5/10 · 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 79% #7/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 83% #3/10 · 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #17/20 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | #10/20 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 60% #15/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 45% #32/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/11 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | #2/50 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
The community generally views the Continental PremiumContact 6 favorably, praising its wet grip, braking confidence, and overall capability across a range of cars including EVs and hot hatches. Criticisms are limited to a soft or soggy sidewall feel, high replacement cost on some OE fitments, and moderate longevity (e.g. ~22k km front on a Polestar 2, ~46k km elsewhere). Noise is considered acceptable, and several users prefer it to Michelin alternatives or the newer PC7 predecessor comparisons.
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
Based on 17 community posts
| Attribute | A · Continental Premium Contact 5 | B · Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 23 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 17″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 11 | 11 |
Continental Premium Contact 5
Continental PremiumContact 6
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better treadwear, dry and handling. Pick the Continental Premium Contact 5 if noise matters most to you.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 79 vs 59 on treadwear.
Continental Premium Contact 5 scores 70 vs 55 on noise.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 84 vs 71 on dry.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 77 vs 67 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 85 vs 77 on our wet score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 71 on our dry score.
Continental Premium Contact 5, 70 vs 55 on our noise score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 75 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 79 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 74 vs 67 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology