Head-to-head Updated

Continental Premium Contact 5 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 14 road tests and 119 + 124 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 3 K125 is ahead, 76–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental Premium Contact 5
± 8

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 63 · 119 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
± 6

Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 75 · 124 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 53 in 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +14
    85
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 12 tests7189
    Reviews found online7179
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–293%100%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–299%100%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–178%100%

    Premium Contact 5: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 71.3 = 71

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 79.3 = 85

  2. 77

    Wet

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +3
    80
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 12 tests7982
    Reviews found online7477
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–097%93%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–080%70%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–197%98%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–198%97%

    Premium Contact 5: 60% × 78.9 + 40% × 73.6 = 77

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 77.2 = 80

  3. 70

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +4
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7576
    Reviews found online6672
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–090%80%

    Premium Contact 5: 40% × 74.8 + 60% × 66.1 = 70

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 40% × 75.9 + 60% × 72.4 = 74

  4. 71

    Noise

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 6 tests7380
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–297%99%

    Premium Contact 5: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 80.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of noise for Premium Contact 5 or Ventus Prime 3 K125. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 58

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests6961
    Reviews found online4371
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–077%75%

    Premium Contact 5: 60% × 68.7 + 40% × 43 = 58

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 61 + 40% × 70.5 = 65

  6. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +8
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Reviews found online6775
  7. 67

    Efficiency

    Premium Contact 5 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5Ventus Prime 3 K125
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 8 tests6766
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–282%84%
Scores at a glance
Continental Premium Contact 5 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Premium Contact 5Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Relative Score 69 76
Dry 71 85
Wet 77 80
Comfort 70 74
Noise 71 75
Treadwear 58 65
Handling (owners) 67 75
Efficiency 67 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Premium Contact 5

± 6

Ventus Prime 3 K125

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 9 tests that ran both, Continental Premium Contact 5 finished ahead 4 times and Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 5 times.

DisciplineCategoryPremium Contact 5Ventus Prime 3 K125ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% 100% −6.1 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Dry Handling Dry 99% 100% −1.4 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 78% 100% −22.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 93% +4.3 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Braking Wet 97% 98% −0.6 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Handling Wet 98% 97% +1.1 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 80% 70% +10.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 90% 80% +10.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Noise Noise 97% 99% −1.8 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wear Treadwear 77% 75% +1.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 82% 84% −2.7 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 72% 84% −11.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #17/20 #11/20 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Value Cost 60% 68% −8.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15
Overall Ranking Overall #7/11 #5/11 – 4–5 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Premium Contact 5

Pros

  • Exceptional grip in both wet and dry road conditions
  • High levels of ride comfort and low cabin noise
  • Predictable and safe handling characteristics

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and body roll
  • Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
All owner themes in the Premium Contact 5 review

Tire B Ventus Prime 3 K125

Pros

  • Excellent dry road grip and braking performance
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Comfortable ride quality with effective vibration absorption

Cons

  • Increased risk of hydroplaning as tread depth decreases
  • Accelerated tread wear on heavier vehicles or under high-torque conditions
  • Noise levels can increase noticeably after several thousand miles
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 3 K125 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Premium Contact 5 B · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2360
Rim diameters14″ – 17″15″ – 20″
Sizes in common1515

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Premium Contact 5

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — better dry, handling and treadwear. Where the Continental Premium Contact 5 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 85 vs 71 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 75 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 65 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 74 vs 70 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is straight aquaplaning

Continental Premium Contact 5 won 2 of 2 shared straight aquaplaning tests.

Tire A · Continental Premium Contact 5
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Premium Contact 5 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Which is better in the wet, Premium Contact 5 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 80 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Premium Contact 5 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 85 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Premium Contact 5 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 75 vs 71 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Premium Contact 5 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 74 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Premium Contact 5 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 65 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Premium Contact 5 or Ventus Prime 3 K125?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology