Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Firestone TZ300 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Firestone TZ300 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 19 owner reviews. How we score
TZ300 is ahead, 63–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
TZ300 +564Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 TZ300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 54 62 Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59
TZ300: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 64
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for TZ300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
56
Wet
TZ300 +965Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 TZ300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 50 63 Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 50.2 = 56
TZ300: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for TZ300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
50
Comfort
TZ300 +1363Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 TZ300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 41 61 Potenza RE030: 40% × 63 (est.) + 60% × 40.6 = 50
TZ300: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.5 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for TZ300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Potenza RE030 +859Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 TZ300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 68 55 Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 67
TZ300: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for TZ300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
47
Handling (owners)
TZ300 +855Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 TZ300 Reviews found online 47 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | Firestone TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 63 |
| Dry | 59 | 64 |
| Wet | 56 | 65 |
| Comfort | 50 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 59 |
| Handling (owners) | 47 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE030
TZ300
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE030
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Reliable and consistent dry road grip
- Strong, stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- High levels of cabin road noise
- Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
- Tendency toward understeer
Tire B TZ300
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong traction in both wet and dry conditions for standard road use
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear life reported across different vehicles
- Reports of increased road noise on certain road surfaces
- Unpredictable handling or light steering feel at higher speeds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | B · Firestone TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| UTQG | 140 A A | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Firestone TZ300
Winner: Firestone TZ300 — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE030 if treadwear matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Firestone TZ300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Firestone TZ300 scores 63 vs 50 on comfort.
Firestone TZ300 scores 65 vs 56 on wet.
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 scores 67 vs 59 on treadwear.
Firestone TZ300 scores 55 vs 47 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE030 or TZ300?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or TZ300?
Firestone TZ300, 65 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or TZ300?
Firestone TZ300, 64 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or TZ300?
Firestone TZ300, 63 vs 50 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or TZ300?
Bridgestone Potenza RE030, 67 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology