Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 8 + 308 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 3 PS3 is ahead, 73–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3

Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 74 · 308 reviews

“I used them for my PS3’s last year, got the cash back offer too. Saved a fortune over the other big name tyre suppliers.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 3 PS3 +13
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Pilot Sport 3 PS3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 63 (est.)67
    Reviews found online5578

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59

    Pilot Sport 3 PS3: 60% × 67.2 + 40% × 78.4 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 56

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 3 PS3 +21
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Pilot Sport 3 PS3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 59 (est.)76
    Reviews found online5179

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56

    Pilot Sport 3 PS3: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 79.4 = 77

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 56

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 3 PS3 +15
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Pilot Sport 3 PS3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4373

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56

    Pilot Sport 3 PS3: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030 or Pilot Sport 3 PS3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 67

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE030 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Pilot Sport 3 PS3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6964

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67

    Pilot Sport 3 PS3: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport 3 PS3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 49

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 3 PS3 +28
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Pilot Sport 3 PS3
    Reviews found online4977
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE030Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3
Relative Score 58 73
Dry 59 72
Wet 56 77
Comfort 56 71
Treadwear 67 65
Handling (owners) 49 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE030

Pilot Sport 3 PS3

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE030

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Reliable and consistent dry road grip
  • Strong, stiff sidewall construction

Cons

  • High levels of cabin road noise
  • Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
  • Tendency toward understeer
All owner themes in the Potenza RE030 review

Tire B Pilot Sport 3 PS3

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip
  • Outstanding wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • Enhanced ride comfort and compliance over road imperfections

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly with spirited driving
  • Softer sidewalls can result in a slightly spongy or 'squidgy' feel during aggressive cornering
  • Higher initial purchase price compared to some mid-range alternatives
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 3 PS3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE030

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Michelin Pilot Sport 3 (PS3) is mixed, with users commending its wet grip, aquaplaning resistance, and daily ride comfort. However, enthusiasts often note soft sidewalls and subdued sportiness compared to the PS2, with many recommending newer iterations like the PS4 and PS4S for sharper handling and reduced road noise.

Top themes
#Wet grip performance#Aquaplaning resistance#Comparison to PS4#Comfortable daily driving#Soft sidewall feel#Road noise issues#Availability and sizing

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE030

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3 — better handling, wet and comfort. Where the Bridgestone Potenza RE030 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3 scores 77 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3 scores 77 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3 scores 71 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3 scores 72 vs 59 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE030 or Pilot Sport 3 PS3?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or Pilot Sport 3 PS3?

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3, 77 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or Pilot Sport 3 PS3?

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3, 72 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or Pilot Sport 3 PS3?

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3, 71 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or Pilot Sport 3 PS3?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology