Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Toyo Proxes CF1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 46 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes CF1 is ahead, 69–58
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Proxes CF1 +1069Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 55 70 Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59
Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
56
Wet
Proxes CF1 +1672Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 51 72 Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56
Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
56
Comfort
Proxes CF1 +1369Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 43 69 Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56
Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030 or Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Potenza RE030 +562Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 69 60 Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67
Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
49
Handling (owners)
Proxes CF1 +2069Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Proxes CF1 Reviews found online 49 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | Toyo Proxes CF1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 69 |
| Dry | 59 | 69 |
| Wet | 56 | 72 |
| Comfort | 56 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
58
/ 100
Potenza RE030
69
/ 100
Proxes CF1
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE030
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Reliable and consistent dry road grip
- Strong, stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- High levels of cabin road noise
- Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
- Tendency toward understeer
Tire B Proxes CF1
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
- Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | B · Toyo Proxes CF1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
58
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza RE030
69
/ 100
Toyo Proxes CF1
Winner: Toyo Proxes CF1 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE030 if treadwear matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 49 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 72 vs 56 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 59 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF1
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE030 or Proxes CF1?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or Proxes CF1?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 72 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or Proxes CF1?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or Proxes CF1?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or Proxes CF1?
Bridgestone Potenza RE030, 67 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology