Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes CF1 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 23 road tests and 46 + 6,449 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 86–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes CF1
Tire AToyo

Proxes CF1

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 5

Summer

Tests 84 · 23 tests Owners 82 · 6,449 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (subj. dry handling)

“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 5 +20
    89
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests≈ 69 (est.)92
    Reviews found online7084

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.2 + 40% × 83.8 = 89

    No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 5 +18
    90
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests≈ 71 (est.)92
    Reviews found online7287

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.4 + 40% × 86.7 = 90

    No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 69

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 5 +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 69 (est.)71
    Reviews found online6981

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 71 + 40% × 80.6 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    47
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests–33
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.2 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 47

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 62

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 5 +20
    82
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 64 (est.)87
    Reviews found online6075

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 74.7 = 82

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 69

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 5 +14
    83
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1Pilot Sport 5
    Reviews found online6983
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes CF1 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes CF1Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Relative Score 69 86
Dry 69 89
Wet 72 90
Comfort 69 75
Noise – 47
Treadwear 62 82
Handling (owners) 69 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Proxes CF1

Pilot Sport 5

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes CF1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
  • Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
All owner themes in the Proxes CF1 review

Tire B Pilot Sport 5

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and dry traction with high resistance to aquaplaning
  • Superior tread life and longevity compared to competitors and previous generations
  • Noticeable improvements in ride comfort and a quieter cabin over rough road surfaces

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to initial steering vagueness or understeer during hard cornering
  • Higher price point compared to some tier-one competitors
  • Performance and grip degrade significantly under intense track heat or heavy circuit use
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 5 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Toyo Proxes CF1

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Positive

Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is overwhelmingly positive for daily street driving, praising its exceptional wet grip, tread longevity, and quiet comfort compared to run-flats and older performance tires. However, several enthusiasts note downsides for aggressive or track use, specifically citing softer sidewalls, muted steering feedback, and poor heat resistance leading to delamination under track conditions. Most drivers consider it an outstanding premium all-rounder for sporty street cars rather than a dedicated track or extreme-performance tire.

Top themes
#wet grip performance#tread wear longevity#daily driving comfort#track heat delamination#soft sidewall steering feedback#road noise levels#comparison with ps4s

Based on 174 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes CF1 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—66
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes CF1

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better dry, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 82 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 90 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 83 vs 69 on handling.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes CF1
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes CF1 or Pilot Sport 5?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes CF1 or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 90 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes CF1 or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 89 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes CF1 or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 75 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Proxes CF1 or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 82 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology