Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE040 vs Michelin Energy — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 49 + 42 owner reviews. How we score

Energy is ahead, 60–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Energy
Tire BMichelin

Energy

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 42 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    Potenza RE040 +3
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Energy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5248

    Potenza RE040: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58

    Energy: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE040. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 54

    Wet

    Energy +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Energy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online4857

    Potenza RE040: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 54

    Energy: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE040. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 50

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Energy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)–
    Reviews found online36–

    Potenza RE040: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 35.9 = 50

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE040. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Energy +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Energy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4260

    Potenza RE040: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.6 = 55

    Energy: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE040 or Energy. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 56

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Energy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online40–

    Potenza RE040: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 40.3 = 56

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE040. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 55

    Treadwear

    Energy +12
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Energy
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4767

    Potenza RE040: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.8 = 55

    Energy: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE040. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 53

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE040 +2
    51
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Energy
    Reviews found online5351
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE040 vs Michelin Energy: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE040Michelin Energy
Relative Score 55 60
Dry 58 55
Wet 54 61
Snow 50 –
Comfort 55 65
Noise 56 –
Treadwear 55 67
Handling (owners) 53 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE040

Energy

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE040

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather grip and handling
  • High level of steering feedback and directness
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway characteristics

Cons

  • Excessive and intrusive road noise
  • Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet or cold conditions
  • Harsh ride quality due to stiff construction
All owner themes in the Potenza RE040 review

Tire B Energy

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
  • Low road noise and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Lack of steering feedback and road feel
  • Inconsistent or poor grip in wet conditions
  • High price point relative to competitors
All owner themes in the Energy review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE040 B · Michelin Energy
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3—
Rim diameters16″ – 18″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG140 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE040

Michelin Energy

Winner: Michelin Energy — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE040 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Energy scores 67 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Energy scores 65 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Energy scores 61 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza RE040 scores 58 vs 55 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE040
Tire B · Michelin Energy

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE040 or Energy?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE040 or Energy?

Michelin Energy, 61 vs 54 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE040 or Energy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE040, 58 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE040 or Energy?

Michelin Energy, 65 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE040 or Energy?

Michelin Energy, 67 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology