Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 43 reviews
Michelin Energy vs Michelin Primacy 4+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 10 road tests and 43 + 40 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy 4+ is ahead, 78–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 10 tests Owners 71 · 40 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Primacy 4+ +2378Why this score
Source Energy Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 48 71 Energy: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 55
Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 71 = 78
No road tests of dry for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
60
Wet
Primacy 4+ +1979Why this score
Source Energy Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 56 75 Energy: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 60
Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 74.6 = 79
No road tests of wet for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Comfort
Primacy 4+ +1071Why this score
Source Energy Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 58 69 Energy: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
Primacy 4+: 40% × 72.9 + 60% × 69.3 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison72Why this score
Source Energy Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests – 76 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Primacy 4+: 60% × 76.2 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 72
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
68
Treadwear
Primacy 4+ +1785Why this score
Source Energy Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 95 Reviews found online 69 70 Energy: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 68
Primacy 4+: 60% × 94.9 + 40% × 69.6 = 85
No road tests of treadwear for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
50
Handling (owners)
Primacy 4+ +1666Why this score
Source Energy Primacy 4+ Reviews found online 50 66 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison78Why this score
Source Energy Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 78
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy | Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 78 |
| Dry | 55 | 78 |
| Wet | 60 | 79 |
| Comfort | 61 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 85 |
| Handling (owners) | 50 | 66 |
| Efficiency | – | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Energy
Primacy 4+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Lack of steering feedback and road feel
- Inconsistent or poor grip in wet conditions
- High price point relative to competitors
Tire B Primacy 4+
Pros
- Strong wet and dry grip and braking confidence, often cited as a big improvement over Bridgestone, Dunlop and Nexen tyres, including on powerful cars and PHEVs that previously spun their tyres
- Comfortable, compliant ride with soft sidewalls that suits softly sprung and family cars
- Low and even tread wear, with several owners reporting little visible wear after 5,000–10,000 miles and one reporting about 60,000 km in hot climates
Cons
- Road noise and drone, especially on rough asphalt, was described as severe by several owners (Skoda Yeti, Lexus), contradicting other reports of quiet running
- Reduced grip and confidence in cold, damp conditions, with two UK owners saying the tyre behaves like a budget tyre
- Premium pricing, with some owners questioning value when life fell short of expectations
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy | B · Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Energy
Michelin Primacy 4+
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4+ — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 78 vs 55 on dry.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 79 vs 60 on wet.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 85 vs 68 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 66 vs 50 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy or Primacy 4+?
Which is better in the wet, Energy or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 79 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 78 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 71 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 85 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology