Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE050 vs Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 60 + 146 owner reviews. How we score

Potenza RE050 is ahead, 60–45

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Potenza RE050 +16
    46
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050Potenza RE050A Run Flat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online5835

    Potenza RE050: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 62

    Potenza RE050A Run Flat: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 34.5 = 46

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE050A Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 61

    Wet

    Potenza RE050 +14
    47
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050Potenza RE050A Run Flat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online5839

    Potenza RE050: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    Potenza RE050A Run Flat: 60% × 52.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.7 = 47

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE050A Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 58

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050Potenza RE050A Run Flat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online50–

    Potenza RE050: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 50.2 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 58

    Comfort

    Potenza RE050 +16
    42
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050Potenza RE050A Run Flat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4715

    Potenza RE050: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 58

    Potenza RE050A Run Flat: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 14.8 = 42

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE050 or Potenza RE050A Run Flat. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050Potenza RE050A Run Flat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    Potenza RE050: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE050. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE050 +9
    48
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050Potenza RE050A Run Flat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online5135

    Potenza RE050: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57

    Potenza RE050A Run Flat: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.3 = 48

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE050A Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 57

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE050 +28
    29
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050Potenza RE050A Run Flat
    Reviews found online5729
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE050 vs Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE050Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat
Relative Score 60 45
Dry 62 46
Wet 61 47
Snow 58 –
Comfort 58 42
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 57 48
Handling (owners) 57 29

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE050

Potenza RE050A Run Flat

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE050

Pros

  • Exceptional dry weather grip and cornering stability
  • High levels of steering feedback and road communication
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics when new

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise over the life of the tire
  • Noticeable decline in wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with many users reporting premature wear
All owner themes in the Potenza RE050 review

Tire B Potenza RE050A Run Flat

Pros

  • Strong grip and predictable handling in dry conditions
  • Precise steering response and high-speed cornering stability
  • Good overall longevity and mileage for certain drivers on smooth highways

Cons

  • Extremely harsh, rigid, and uncomfortable ride quality
  • Severe tramlining and tendency to follow ruts or road imperfections
  • Poor grip, reduced traction, and nervous handling in wet weather
All owner themes in the Potenza RE050A Run Flat review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050 B · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available4—
Rim diameters17″ – 19″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG140 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE050

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat

Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE050 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza RE050 scores 57 vs 29 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza RE050 scores 62 vs 46 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Potenza RE050 scores 58 vs 42 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza RE050 scores 61 vs 47 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE050 or Potenza RE050A Run Flat?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE050 or Potenza RE050A Run Flat?

Bridgestone Potenza RE050, 61 vs 47 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE050 or Potenza RE050A Run Flat?

Bridgestone Potenza RE050, 62 vs 46 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE050 or Potenza RE050A Run Flat?

Bridgestone Potenza RE050, 58 vs 42 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE050 or Potenza RE050A Run Flat?

Bridgestone Potenza RE050, 57 vs 48 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology