Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 60 reviews
Yokohama Advan S.T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza RE050 vs Yokohama Advan S.T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 60 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza RE050 is ahead, 57–46
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Potenza RE050 +1148Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 Advan S.T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 55 37 Potenza RE050: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 59
Advan S.T: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 37 = 48
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
59
Wet
Potenza RE050 +1247Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 Advan S.T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 53 (est.) Reviews found online 54 38 Potenza RE050: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59
Advan S.T: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 38 = 47
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
57
Snow
Potenza RE050 +948Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 Advan S.T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 48 32 Potenza RE050: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 57
Advan S.T: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 48
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
50
Comfort
Potenza RE050 +1238Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 Advan S.T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 42 23 Potenza RE050: 40% × 63.3 (est.) + 60% × 41.9 = 50
Advan S.T: 40% × 59.5 (est.) + 60% × 23.1 = 38
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Noise
Potenza RE050 +654Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 Advan S.T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 50 36 Potenza RE050: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 60
Advan S.T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 54
No road tests of noise for Potenza RE050 or Advan S.T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
Potenza RE050 +1044Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 Advan S.T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 53 (est.) Reviews found online 47 30 Potenza RE050: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.5 = 54
Advan S.T: 60% × 53.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.9 = 44
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
52
Handling (owners)
Potenza RE050 +1834Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 Advan S.T Reviews found online 52 34
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE050 | Yokohama Advan S.T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 46 |
| Dry | 59 | 48 |
| Wet | 59 | 47 |
| Snow | 57 | 48 |
| Comfort | 50 | 38 |
| Noise | 60 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 44 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | 34 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE050
Advan S.T
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE050
Pros
- Exceptional dry weather grip and cornering stability
- High levels of steering feedback and road communication
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics when new
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise over the life of the tire
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with many users reporting premature wear
Tire B Advan S.T
Pros
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Relatively low noise levels reported by some users
- Good grip in both dry and wet conditions for certain drivers
Cons
- Extremely poor durability resulting in premature replacement and rapid tread wear
- Structural defects including tire distortion and sidewall bulges within low mileage
- High price point relative to the lifespan and quality provided
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050 | B · Yokohama Advan S.T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 4 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 19″ | 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 140 A A | 420 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050
Yokohama Advan S.T
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE050 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan S.T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Potenza RE050 scores 52 vs 34 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza RE050 scores 59 vs 47 on wet.
Bridgestone Potenza RE050 scores 50 vs 38 on comfort.
Bridgestone Potenza RE050 scores 59 vs 48 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE050 or Advan S.T?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE050 or Advan S.T?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050, 59 vs 47 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE050 or Advan S.T?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050, 59 vs 48 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Potenza RE050 or Advan S.T?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050, 57 vs 48 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Potenza RE050 or Advan S.T?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050, 60 vs 54 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE050 or Advan S.T?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050, 50 vs 38 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE050 or Advan S.T?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050, 54 vs 44 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology