Yokohama Advan S.T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Yokohama Advan S.T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 73–46

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Advan S.T
± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +27
    48
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online8337

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.7 = 75

    Advan S.T: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 37 = 48

    No road tests of dry for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +33
    47
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 77 (est.)≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online8338

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80

    Advan S.T: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 38 = 47

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    CrossContact LX25 +5
    48
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests40≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7232

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 53

    Advan S.T: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 48

    No road tests of snow for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +38
    38
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7923

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76

    Advan S.T: 40% × 59.5 (est.) + 60% × 23.1 = 38

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    CrossContact LX25 +17
    54
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7836

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 71

    Advan S.T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 54

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25 or Advan S.T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +28
    44
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Advan S.T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online7630

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    Advan S.T: 60% × 53.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.9 = 44

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan S.T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +45
    34
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Advan S.T
    Reviews found online7934
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Yokohama Advan S.T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Yokohama Advan S.T
Relative Score 73 46
Dry 75 48
Wet 80 47
Snow 53 48
Comfort 76 38
Noise 71 54
Treadwear 72 44
Handling (owners) 79 34

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 8

Advan S.T

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Advan S.T

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Relatively low noise levels reported by some users
  • Good grip in both dry and wet conditions for certain drivers

Cons

  • Extremely poor durability resulting in premature replacement and rapid tread wear
  • Structural defects including tire distortion and sidewall bulges within low mileage
  • High price point relative to the lifespan and quality provided
All owner themes in the Advan S.T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Yokohama Advan S.T
CategoryAll Season—
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4—
Sizes available401
Rim diameters16″ – 22″20″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″11/32″
UTQG740 A A - B420 A B
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Yokohama Advan S.T

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan S.T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 34 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 38 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 47 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 72 vs 44 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Yokohama Advan S.T

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or Advan S.T?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Advan S.T?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 47 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Advan S.T?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or Advan S.T?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 53 vs 48 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or Advan S.T?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 54 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Advan S.T?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 38 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Advan S.T?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology