Tests – · none yet Owners 32 · 10 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A RFT vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is ahead, 73–44
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 2 tests Owners 67 · 2,838 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
49
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +2877Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 77 Reviews found online 39 77 -
44
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +3377Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 78 Reviews found online 36 75 -
–
Snow
No comparison50Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Reviews found online – 36 -
44
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +3074Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 76 Reviews found online 19 71 -
52
Noise
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +1668Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 68 Reviews found online 30 69 -
42
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +2264Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Reviews found online 24 63 -
32
Handling
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +4274Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 Reviews found online 32 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE050A RFT | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 44 | 73 |
| Dry | 49 | 77 |
| Wet | 44 | 77 |
| Snow | – | 50 |
| Comfort | 44 | 74 |
| Noise | 52 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 42 | 64 |
| Handling | 32 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Potenza RE050A RFT
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE050A RFT
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry traction and braking performance
- Superior ride comfort and significantly reduced road noise compared to competitors or run-flats
- Predictable and progressive handling limits
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on high-powered or rear-wheel-drive vehicles
- Softer sidewalls can induce a 'spongy' or 'jelly-like' feel during sharp, high-speed direction changes
- Susceptible to sidewall bulging or cracking when encountering harsh potholes, especially in run-flat variants
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A RFT | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Max Performance Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 10 |
| Rim diameters | — | 18″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 - 300 AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A RFT
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 74 vs 32 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 77 vs 44 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 74 vs 44 on comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 77 vs 49 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.