Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 146 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ventus S1 evo3 is ahead, 68–44
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 19 tests Owners 60 · 3,335 reviews
“That would tally with what this person found with the 127 variant that preceded it “Hi just for information,I asked Hankook what tread depth when new was on their Ventus S1 Evo 3 K127 tyre, the reply was 6.6 mm””
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
47
Dry
Ventus S1 evo3 +3077Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 85 Reviews found online 35 64 -
46
Wet
Ventus S1 evo3 +3177Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 83 Reviews found online 37 68 -
42
Comfort
Ventus S1 evo3 +2264Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 68 Reviews found online 16 59 -
–
Noise
No comparison71Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 73 -
48
Treadwear
Ventus S1 evo3 +755Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 61 Reviews found online 36 46 -
29
Handling
Ventus S1 evo3 +3160Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Ventus S1 evo3 Reviews found online 29 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 44 | 68 |
| Dry | 47 | 77 |
| Wet | 46 | 77 |
| Comfort | 42 | 64 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 48 | 55 |
| Handling | 29 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Potenza RE050A Run Flat
Ventus S1 evo3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE050A Run Flat
Pros
- Strong grip and predictable handling in dry conditions
- Precise steering response and high-speed cornering stability
- Good overall longevity and mileage for certain drivers on smooth highways
Cons
- Extremely harsh, rigid, and uncomfortable ride quality
- Severe tramlining and tendency to follow ruts or road imperfections
- Poor grip, reduced traction, and nervous handling in wet weather
Tire B Ventus S1 evo3
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
- Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
The Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 receives mixed reviews from the community, with some users praising its solid performance, great value, and good grip compared to competitors, while others note concerns regarding longevity, stock wear, and variations in ratings across different sizes. Discussions also highlight specific variant differences, such as the K127 standard version versus the K127e Tesla-specific version.
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
“Small tire size change having different ratings? (Hankook Ventus S1 Evo3) Hi all, I'm looking for a good all round tire for my MX5 (I'm in the non snowy regions of the UK so summer tires) and a pretty popular recommendation are the Ventus S1 Evo 3s. At the MX5's stock size of 205/45/R17 they are rated at A for fuel and wet performance, and 68db of noise, which is great! However I'd like to size up to 215/45/R17, and for whatever reason the ratings drop to B for fuel and wet performance, and most importantly to me, 71db of noise. I was just wondering how such a small difference in size changes things quite drastically? I know these ratings aren't that important, but it seems strange to me they'd change at all Thanks! Read more”
“Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 uneven wear I’ve been using this tyre and have been satisfied with its performance on my BMW G30. Just that I realised that there is an uneven thread wear on the outer side. The main thread has still some thread about 2mm from the thread wear indicator. This is the right front tyre. All other tyres thread wear looks fine. Is this particular tyre still safe to be used for another 10,000km? Or urgently needs to be changed? Anyone has any experience with uneven wear like this? Read more”
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 77 vs 46 on wet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 60 vs 29 on handling.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 77 vs 47 on dry.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 64 vs 42 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.