Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 146 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 146 + 15 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Sport AS is ahead, 61–45
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 64 · 15 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
46
Dry
Advan Sport AS +551Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 54 (est.) 42 Reviews found online 35 64 Potenza RE050A Run Flat: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 34.5 = 46
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 42.3 + 40% × 64.4 = 51
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE050A Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
47
Wet
Advan Sport AS +1461Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 52 (est.) 57 Reviews found online 39 68 Potenza RE050A Run Flat: 60% × 52.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.7 = 47
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57 + 40% × 67.6 = 61
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE050A Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison58Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online – 50 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 58
No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
42
Comfort
Advan Sport AS +2365Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 15 68 Potenza RE050A Run Flat: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 14.8 = 42
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 67.9 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE050A Run Flat. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 73 Reviews found online – 67 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 67.3 = 70
-
48
Treadwear
Advan Sport AS +2573Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 35 64 Potenza RE050A Run Flat: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.3 = 48
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 63.7 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE050A Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
29
Handling (owners)
Advan Sport AS +3766Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat Advan Sport AS Reviews found online 29 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat | Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 45 | 61 |
| Dry | 46 | 51 |
| Wet | 47 | 61 |
| Snow | – | 58 |
| Comfort | 42 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 48 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 29 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza RE050A Run Flat
Advan Sport AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE050A Run Flat
Pros
- Strong grip and predictable handling in dry conditions
- Precise steering response and high-speed cornering stability
- Good overall longevity and mileage for certain drivers on smooth highways
Cons
- Extremely harsh, rigid, and uncomfortable ride quality
- Severe tramlining and tendency to follow ruts or road imperfections
- Poor grip, reduced traction, and nervous handling in wet weather
Tire B Advan Sport AS
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
- Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
- Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
- Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
- Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat | B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat
Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport AS — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 66 vs 29 on handling.
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 73 vs 48 on treadwear.
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 65 vs 42 on comfort.
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 61 vs 47 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE050A Run Flat or Advan Sport AS?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE050A Run Flat or Advan Sport AS?
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 61 vs 47 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE050A Run Flat or Advan Sport AS?
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 51 vs 46 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE050A Run Flat or Advan Sport AS?
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 65 vs 42 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE050A Run Flat or Advan Sport AS?
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 73 vs 48 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology