Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A vs Lexani Terrain Beast AT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 2,182 + 102 owner reviews. How we score

Terrain Beast AT leads, 61–57 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    Potenza RE050A +3
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050ATerrain Beast AT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online5752

    Potenza RE050A: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61

    Terrain Beast AT: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Terrain Beast AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 59

    Wet

    Terrain Beast AT +4
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050ATerrain Beast AT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5460

    Potenza RE050A: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 59

    Terrain Beast AT: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 63

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Terrain Beast AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 57

    Snow

    Terrain Beast AT +6
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050ATerrain Beast AT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4858

    Potenza RE050A: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 57

    Terrain Beast AT: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 58.4 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Terrain Beast AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 48

    Comfort

    Terrain Beast AT +8
    56
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050ATerrain Beast AT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online3851

    Potenza RE050A: 40% × 62.5 (est.) + 60% × 38.1 = 48

    Terrain Beast AT: 40% × 65 (est.) + 60% × 50.7 = 56

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Terrain Beast AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    Level
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050ATerrain Beast AT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5556

    Potenza RE050A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62

    Terrain Beast AT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE050A or Terrain Beast AT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 51

    Treadwear

    Terrain Beast AT +9
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050ATerrain Beast AT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online4156

    Potenza RE050A: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.2 = 51

    Terrain Beast AT: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.6 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Terrain Beast AT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050ATerrain Beast AT
    Reviews found online54–
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A vs Lexani Terrain Beast AT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE050ALexani Terrain Beast AT
Relative Score 57 61
Dry 61 58
Wet 59 63
Snow 57 63
Comfort 48 56
Noise 62 62
Treadwear 51 60
Handling (owners) 54 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Potenza RE050A

± 8

Terrain Beast AT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE050A

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering stability
  • Precise steering response and sharp turn-in feedback
  • Stiff sidewalls that enhance sporty handling and provide rim protection

Cons

  • Harsh ride quality and stiff impact absorption, especially over rough roads and potholes
  • Noticeable and escalating road noise as the tires wear
  • Mediocre performance and reduced traction in cold temperatures or wintry conditions
All owner themes in the Potenza RE050A review

Tire B Terrain Beast AT

Pros

  • Exceptional price and overall value compared to major brand alternatives
  • Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain tire
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality on the highway

Cons

  • Quality control issues reported by some users, including out-of-round tires and broken steel belts
  • Balancing difficulties or minor high-speed vibrations for certain sets
  • Tread pattern tends to pick up and throw gravel rocks
All owner themes in the Terrain Beast AT review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A is largely mixed, with drivers acknowledging solid dry grip, responsive handling, and decent wet traction when warm. However, many owners criticize the tire's harsh ride quality, high road noise, fast treadwear, high replacement cost, and complete lack of traction in cold or snowy conditions. Run-flat variants are particularly disliked for their stiff ride and difficulty of repair.

Top themes
#tread life and wear#cold and snow performance#ride comfort and stiffness#dry and wet grip#high replacement cost#run flat complaints#road noise

Based on 76 community posts

Tire B

Lexani Terrain Beast AT

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A B · Lexani Terrain Beast AT
CategorySummerAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available3728
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″14.1/32″
UTQG140 A A—
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi80 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A

Lexani Terrain Beast AT

Narrow edge: Lexani Terrain Beast AT — better treadwear, comfort and snow. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Lexani Terrain Beast AT scores 60 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Lexani Terrain Beast AT scores 56 vs 48 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Lexani Terrain Beast AT scores 63 vs 57 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Lexani Terrain Beast AT scores 63 vs 59 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
Tire B · Lexani Terrain Beast AT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE050A or Terrain Beast AT?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE050A or Terrain Beast AT?

Lexani Terrain Beast AT, 63 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE050A or Terrain Beast AT?

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A, 61 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Potenza RE050A or Terrain Beast AT?

Lexani Terrain Beast AT, 63 vs 57 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Potenza RE050A or Terrain Beast AT?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 62 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE050A or Terrain Beast AT?

Lexani Terrain Beast AT, 56 vs 48 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE050A or Terrain Beast AT?

Lexani Terrain Beast AT, 60 vs 51 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology