Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 2,182 reviews
“Got my Camelot rims mounted with Bridgestone Potenza Re050a tires!”
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 23 road tests and 2,182 + 6,469 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 87–57
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 88 · 6,469 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
Pilot Sport 5 +3192Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 93 Reviews found online 58 91 Potenza RE050A: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 61
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 90.8 = 92
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
59
Wet
Pilot Sport 5 +3594Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 94 Reviews found online 55 94 Potenza RE050A: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 94.1 + 40% × 93.6 = 94
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
57
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) – Reviews found online 49 – Potenza RE050A: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 57
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
49
Comfort
Pilot Sport 5 +3079Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 39 85 Potenza RE050A: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 38.9 = 49
Pilot Sport 5: 40% × 71 + 60% × 84.7 = 79
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE050A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Noise
Potenza RE050A +1547Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 33 Reviews found online 56 ≈ 67 (est.) Potenza RE050A: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 62
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 47
No road tests of noise for Potenza RE050A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
51
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 5 +3687Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 57 (est.) 92 Reviews found online 41 79 Potenza RE050A: 60% × 57.3 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 51
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 91.9 + 40% × 78.7 = 87
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
55
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 5 +3489Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pilot Sport 5 Reviews found online 55 89 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison64Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests – 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE050A | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 87 |
| Dry | 61 | 92 |
| Wet | 59 | 94 |
| Snow | 57 | – |
| Comfort | 49 | 79 |
| Noise | 62 | 47 |
| Treadwear | 51 | 87 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 89 |
| Efficiency | – | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
57
/ 100
Potenza RE050A
87
/ 100
Pilot Sport 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza RE050A | Pilot Sport 5 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/8 2015 Australian Motor 235/35 R19 Tyre Test | #9/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE050A
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip and cornering stability
- Precise steering response and sharp turn-in feedback
- Stiff sidewalls that enhance sporty handling and provide rim protection
Cons
- Harsh ride quality and stiff impact absorption, especially over rough roads and potholes
- Noticeable and escalating road noise as the tires wear
- Mediocre performance and reduced traction in cold temperatures or wintry conditions
Tire B Pilot Sport 5
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry traction with high resistance to aquaplaning
- Superior tread life and longevity compared to competitors and previous generations
- Noticeable improvements in ride comfort and a quieter cabin over rough road surfaces
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to initial steering vagueness or understeer during hard cornering
- Higher price point compared to some tier-one competitors
- Performance and grip degrade significantly under intense track heat or heavy circuit use
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A is largely mixed, with drivers acknowledging solid dry grip, responsive handling, and decent wet traction when warm. However, many owners criticize the tire's harsh ride quality, high road noise, fast treadwear, high replacement cost, and complete lack of traction in cold or snowy conditions. Run-flat variants are particularly disliked for their stiff ride and difficulty of repair.
e90post.com
“So here's whats on my car, and how I got here (2011 335d m-sport): Rear: RE 050 A, no designation of I or II, so I'm thinking they were first gen. The BMW dealership put them on the car at about 18k. Front: Original OEM from the factory RE 050 A I. I'm about to have these two replaced tomorrow after a major alignment issue has worn both outside front edges, although the car tracks straight... we'll see what i end up with tomorrow!”
r/skoda
·26 upvotes ·2022-03-09
“Got my Camelot rims mounted with Bridgestone Potenza Re050a tires!”
r/CamryTRD
·1 upvote ·2026-04-18
“Re050a is more of a semi racing stickies. It's more in line with the potenza race. Any of the popular sport tires i.e pilot sport or potenza sport will do. For me. I'd go for Toyo Proxes sport 2.”
Top themes
#tread life and wear#cold and snow performance#ride comfort and stiffness#dry and wet grip#high replacement cost#run flat complaints#road noise
Based on 76 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
The community generally views the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 as an exceptional daily-driving tire that bridges the gap between high performance and everyday comfort. Users frequently praise its outstanding wet grip, low road noise, and impressive tread life compared to more track-focused alternatives like the PS4S. However, some enthusiast drivers feel the sidewalls and feedback can feel a bit numb or soft for aggressive track use, noting it is built more for sporty road use than dedicated circuit driving.
r/AudiA5
·1 upvote ·2026-04-30
“I had PS5’s on they were great literally all the grip you could ever want (not a very powerful car) and they have an incredibly long life span, I didn’t find them loud at all and i also now have an Audi a5 coupe and the car itself blocks out most noise especially if you have music on so it’s not something you should worry about, I know the Asym6 have more grip but it’s marginal I’d personally get the ps5’s just because of the beautiful side wall!”
bimmerforums.co.uk
·1 upvote ·2024-05-06
“look at camskill,always the cheapest,ive just gotten the michelin ps5 for my M4 ,not fitted yet as my conti sport 7 still have life,only bought last month as there was a cashback offer from michelin at camskill,i got £80 so got 2 x 275-35-19 and x2 255-35-19 for £617 delivered,”
r/ft86
·2 upvotes ·2026-07-21
“PS5 is a very good allround, comfortable but grippy tire. PS4S has a stiffer sidewall and is way sportier but harsher. There is to date no successor for the PS4S. I switched from PS4S to PS5 on my mustang and its a way better fit for a daily tire. I would remommend to get PS5 for the rear aswell.”
Top themes
#Wet grip and safety#Tread life and durability#Road noise and comfort#Daily driving performance#Soft sidewall feedback#Comparison to PS4S and competitors#Value and pricing
Based on 177 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 37 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 140 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 22 | 22 |
Which one should you actually buy?
57
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
87
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better treadwear, wet and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 87 vs 51 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 94 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 55 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 92 vs 61 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE050A or Pilot Sport 5?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE050A or Pilot Sport 5?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 94 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE050A or Pilot Sport 5?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 92 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Potenza RE050A or Pilot Sport 5?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A, 62 vs 47 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE050A or Pilot Sport 5?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 79 vs 49 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE050A or Pilot Sport 5?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 87 vs 51 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology