Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE070r vs Kumho Ecsta PS31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 259 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Potenza RE070r 67, Ecsta PS31 66.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Potenza RE070r

Potenza RE070r

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 4 reviews

Kumho Ecsta PS31
Tire BKumho

Ecsta PS31

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 259 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Potenza RE070r +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070rEcsta PS31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7463

    Potenza RE070r: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 72

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE070r. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 66

    Wet

    Ecsta PS31 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070rEcsta PS31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6568

    Potenza RE070r: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE070r. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    57
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070rEcsta PS31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–49

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 57

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS31 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070rEcsta PS31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5265

    Potenza RE070r: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 60

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE070r or Ecsta PS31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070rEcsta PS31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–67

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Ecsta PS31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    Ecsta PS31 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070rEcsta PS31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5865

    Potenza RE070r: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE070r. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE070r +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070rEcsta PS31
    Reviews found online7267
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE070r vs Kumho Ecsta PS31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE070rKumho Ecsta PS31
Relative Score 67 66
Dry 72 65
Wet 66 68
Snow – 57
Comfort 60 67
Noise – 67
Treadwear 61 65
Handling (owners) 72 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE070r

Ecsta PS31

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE070r

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
  • Excellent steering feedback and communication
  • Strong performance consistency under high-heat track conditions

Cons

  • Very stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh ride
  • Rapid tread wear
  • Increased road noise
All owner themes in the Potenza RE070r review

Tire B Ecsta PS31

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE070r B · Kumho Ecsta PS31
CategorySummer Extreme Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available121
Rim diameters20″15″ – 18″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—460 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE070r

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza RE070r and Kumho Ecsta PS31 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza RE070r is stronger on dry. Kumho Ecsta PS31 is stronger on comfort and treadwear. Bridgestone Potenza RE070r rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza RE070r scores 72 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 67 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 65 vs 61 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE070r
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE070r or Ecsta PS31?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE070r or Ecsta PS31?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE070r or Ecsta PS31?

Bridgestone Potenza RE070r, 72 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE070r or Ecsta PS31?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 67 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE070r or Ecsta PS31?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 65 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology