Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 259 reviews
Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ecsta PS71 leads, 68–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,166 reviews
“On Blackcircles all the 245/40 R19 ditch finders cost around £100 and have a poor wet grip & all the decent mid range cost around £170 and have A rated wet grip. Would you risk it for £240? I know I wouldn't. The cheapest A wet rated is a Kuhmo Ecsta PS71 at £136 if you really want to keep the cost down. If you want a relatively soft comfortable tyre then a Hankook S1 Evo 3 is an excellent choice.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Ecsta PS71 +1175Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) – 78 Reviews found online 63 71 -
69
Wet
Ecsta PS71 +1584Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) – 90 Reviews found online 68 73 -
58
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta PS71 Reviews found online 50 – -
67
Comfort
Ecsta PS71 +471Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online 65 65 -
67
Noise
Ecsta PS31 +2938Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) – 18 Reviews found online 66 – -
65
Treadwear
Ecsta PS31 +1352Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) – 45 Reviews found online 65 63 -
67
Handling
Ecsta PS71 +471Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecsta PS71 Reviews found online 67 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PS31 | Kumho Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 68 |
| Dry | 64 | 75 |
| Wet | 69 | 84 |
| Snow | 58 | – |
| Comfort | 67 | 71 |
| Noise | 67 | 38 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 52 |
| Handling | 67 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Ecsta PS31
Ecsta PS71
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta PS31
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
- Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
Tire B Ecsta PS71
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
- Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
- Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
- Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Kumho Ecsta PS31
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.
“Kumho PS71 Question Replaced an older (2021 or 2022 production) set of ps71 with a new set (production 39-42 week of 2024) and noticed something on the new sidewalls I hadn't seen on the old ones. The new ones have ps71 with either a 1 or a 2 under it right above the bead in very small text. I'm curious what they mean if anything at all.”
“go with Kumho Ecsta PS71 EV around £140 – £165. Good value for money”
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
Based on 24 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 | B · Kumho Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 21 | 133 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 460 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecsta PS31
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PS31 if noise and treadwear matter most to you.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 67 vs 38 on noise.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 84 vs 69 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 65 vs 52 on treadwear.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 75 vs 64 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.