tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 8,168 + 60 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS71 leads, 73–71 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Ecsta PS71 or BluEarth Es ES32 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

± 5

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,168 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Ecsta PS71 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests78≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7271

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 72.2 = 75

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 85

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +11
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests92≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7575

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 74.8 = 85

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6675

    Ecsta PS71: 40% × 75.3 + 60% × 65.8 = 70

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 74.7 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 36

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests15–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 36

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 51

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +14
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests45≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6165

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 45.1 + 40% × 60.7 = 51

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 73

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online7375
  7. 48

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests48–
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS71Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 73 71
Dry 75 70
Wet 85 74
Comfort 70 73
Noise 36 –
Treadwear 51 65
Handling (owners) 73 75
Efficiency 48 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Ecsta PS71

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2024-10-25

“I've had the PS71 several years ago - it was ok, nothing spectacular. They might have changed the compound now, so it may be better. Its a good tire, I don't remember any real weaknesses, it just never felt like "yeah, this sticks like glue to the road". Edit: I just remembered - it was mediocre in the city - when the tire was not warmed up, but I reckon this is shared between most sport tires with high speed rating. Once warmed up was good.”
r/TeslaUK ·2 upvotes ·2026-08-28

“go with Kumho Ecsta PS71 EV around £140 – £165. Good value for money”
bimmerforums.co.uk ·1 upvote ·2024-05-05

“On Blackcircles all the 245/40 R19 ditch finders cost around £100 and have a poor wet grip & all the decent mid range cost around £170 and have A rated wet grip. Would you risk it for £240? I know I wouldn't. The cheapest A wet rated is a Kuhmo Ecsta PS71 at £136 if you really want to keep the cost down. If you want a relatively soft comfortable tyre then a Hankook S1 Evo 3 is an excellent choice.”
Top themes
#Value for money#Wet grip performance#UHP budget alternative#Tread wear durability#Warm-up temperature behavior#Tire pressure specifications

Based on 24 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available13364
Rim diameters16″ – 22″13″ – 18″
SidewallBlackwall—
Sizes in common2424

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Narrow edge: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 65 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 85 vs 74 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 75 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 70 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS71 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS71 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 85 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS71 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS71 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS71 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 65 vs 51 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology