Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 4 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE070r vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 40 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza RE070r is ahead, 67–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 40 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
Potenza RE070r +1359Why this score
Source Potenza RE070r ADVAN Neova AD08RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 74 54 Potenza RE070r: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 72
ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 59
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE070r. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
66
Wet
Potenza RE070r +462Why this score
Source Potenza RE070r ADVAN Neova AD08RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 65 59 Potenza RE070r: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66
ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE070r. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
60
Comfort
ADVAN Neova AD08RS +262Why this score
Source Potenza RE070r ADVAN Neova AD08RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 52 55 Potenza RE070r: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 60
ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE070r or ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
ADVAN Neova AD08RS +465Why this score
Source Potenza RE070r ADVAN Neova AD08RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 58 65 Potenza RE070r: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61
ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE070r. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
72
Handling (owners)
Potenza RE070r +1260Why this score
Source Potenza RE070r ADVAN Neova AD08RS Reviews found online 72 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE070r | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 61 |
| Dry | 72 | 59 |
| Wet | 66 | 62 |
| Comfort | 60 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE070r
ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE070r
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
- Excellent steering feedback and communication
- Strong performance consistency under high-heat track conditions
Cons
- Very stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh ride
- Rapid tread wear
- Increased road noise
Tire B ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Pros
- Exceptional treadwear longevity and durability
- Stiff, robust sidewalls providing precise turn-in response
- Good wet performance and hydroplaning resistance for a sporty tire
Cons
- Noticeably lower dry grip and higher limits compared to the older AD08R
- Prone to loud squealing early before reaching true limits
- Harder compound can feel unpredictable or slippery when cold or in wet conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE070r | B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 35 |
| Rim diameters | 20″ | 14″ – 19″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE070r
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE070r — better dry, handling and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS if treadwear matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza RE070r rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Potenza RE070r scores 72 vs 59 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza RE070r scores 72 vs 60 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza RE070r scores 66 vs 62 on wet.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 65 vs 61 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE070r or ADVAN Neova AD08RS?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE070r or ADVAN Neova AD08RS?
Bridgestone Potenza RE070r, 66 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE070r or ADVAN Neova AD08RS?
Bridgestone Potenza RE070r, 72 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE070r or ADVAN Neova AD08RS?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE070r or ADVAN Neova AD08RS?
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS, 65 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology