Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 13 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 vs Continental EcoContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 6 road tests and 13 + 3,241 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza RE11 is ahead, 73–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 6 tests Owners 49 · 3,241 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“For efficiency I would recommend continental ecocontact 6/7. I get around 11kw/100km in the city and 14-15kw/100km on the highway. Would recommend. RWD 19 inch wheels Not very good on a rainy road tho”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
Potenza RE11 +1166Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 83 50 Potenza RE11: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.7 = 77
EcoContact 6: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 50 = 66
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
73
Wet
Potenza RE11 +2053Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 53 Reviews found online 74 54 Potenza RE11: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73
EcoContact 6: 60% × 53 + 40% × 54.1 = 53
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
56
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) – Reviews found online 46 – Potenza RE11: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 56
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
Potenza RE11 +663Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 70 57 Potenza RE11: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69
EcoContact 6: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE11 or EcoContact 6. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
EcoContact 6 +1078Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 68 ≈ 67 (est.) Potenza RE11: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68
EcoContact 6: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 78
No road tests of noise for Potenza RE11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for EcoContact 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
66
Treadwear
Potenza RE11 +363Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 EcoContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 66 40 Potenza RE11: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66
EcoContact 6: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 40.3 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
78
Handling (owners)
Potenza RE11 +2850Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 EcoContact 6 Reviews found online 78 50
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE11 | Continental EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 61 |
| Dry | 77 | 66 |
| Wet | 73 | 53 |
| Snow | 56 | – |
| Comfort | 69 | 63 |
| Noise | 68 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza RE11
EcoContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE11
Pros
- Surreal and formidable dry grip
- Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
- Better-than-expected tread life and longevity under spirited driving and track use
Cons
- Can become greasy on a hot track if pushed too hard
- Increases in road noise compared to standard tires
- Stiff sidewalls that contribute to a firmer ride
Tire B EcoContact 6
Pros
- Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Good dry grip and stable handling under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, especially on drive wheels
- Subpar wet-weather grip and high susceptibility to aquaplaning
- Shallow initial tread depth out of the box (approx. 6.0-6.5mm)
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Potenza RE11
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental EcoContact 6
Community sentiment regarding the Continental Eco Contact 6 is overwhelmingly negative, with users frequently criticizing its poor wet weather grip, braking performance, and handling. While praised occasionally for low rolling resistance and energy efficiency, owners repeatedly report premature tread wear, cracking, and chunking or delamination under normal driving conditions.
“Experience with stock Continental EcoContact 6 tyres & moving to All-Seasons? Hey everyone, We recently had a puncture after clipping a rock on the exit of a car park, which has led me down a bit of a rabbit hole researching replacement options. It seems like the stock Continental EcoContact 6s get quite a lot of mixed-to-negative feedback online, particularly when it comes to wet weather performance and durability. I was curious what everyone's real-world experience has been with them so far? Are they really as mediocre in the wet as the reviews suggest, or do they hold up fine under normal driving? We've only had our buzz a week, so out experience is limited and only driven in dry conditions. Additionally, has anyone made the switch to dedicated all-season tyres on their Buzz, such as the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the Michelin CrossClimate 2? I'd love to know how they affect range, cabin noise, and overall grip, especially coming from the factory eco-tyres. We live in SW England where we get a lot of rain and occasional snow in the winter. Cheers!”
“What’s your opinion about eco tires like the continental eco contact 6, Michelin energy saver, etc. My car came with the continental eco contact 6 and i found them average on the dry. But, in the wet they felt bad, and in the rain especially around here in mountainous roads, they felt bad while turning and slowing down for a corner soon after i replaced them with the crossclimate 2 and still thinking about what I’m going to do with them if i put them on again on summer or sell them and keep the cross climate on. Read more”
“Just did not wish folk to think it may be dangerous. I do agree with you though, 38psi is high, and they go much higher as the tyre warms during driving.”
Based on 29 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11 | B · Continental EcoContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 104 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 320 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11
Continental EcoContact 6
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE11 — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Continental EcoContact 6 if noise matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza RE11 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 78 vs 50 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 73 vs 53 on wet.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 77 vs 66 on dry.
Continental EcoContact 6 scores 78 vs 68 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE11 or EcoContact 6?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE11 or EcoContact 6?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 73 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE11 or EcoContact 6?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 77 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Potenza RE11 or EcoContact 6?
Continental EcoContact 6, 78 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE11 or EcoContact 6?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 69 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE11 or EcoContact 6?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology