Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 13 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 vs Kumho Ecsta PA51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 13 + 165 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza RE11 leads, 70–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 165 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
Potenza RE11 +968Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 83 68 Potenza RE11: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.7 = 77
Ecsta PA51: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
73
Wet
Potenza RE11 +568Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 74 67 Potenza RE11: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73
Ecsta PA51: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
56
Snow
Ecsta PA51 +662Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 46 57 Potenza RE11: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 56
Ecsta PA51: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 62
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
Potenza RE11 +366Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 70 63 Potenza RE11: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69
Ecsta PA51: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE11 or Ecsta PA51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
Ecsta PA51 +169Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 68 73 Potenza RE11: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68
Ecsta PA51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 69
No road tests of noise for Potenza RE11 or Ecsta PA51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Ecsta PA51 +571Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 66 72 Potenza RE11: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66
Ecsta PA51: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 71.8 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
78
Handling (owners)
Potenza RE11 +1266Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Ecsta PA51 Reviews found online 78 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE11 | Kumho Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 67 |
| Dry | 77 | 68 |
| Wet | 73 | 68 |
| Snow | 56 | 62 |
| Comfort | 69 | 66 |
| Noise | 68 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE11
Ecsta PA51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE11
Pros
- Surreal and formidable dry grip
- Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
- Better-than-expected tread life and longevity under spirited driving and track use
Cons
- Can become greasy on a hot track if pushed too hard
- Increases in road noise compared to standard tires
- Stiff sidewalls that contribute to a firmer ride
Tire B Ecsta PA51
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
- Some reports of increased road noise over time
- Limited availability in certain niche sizes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11 | B · Kumho Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 13 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 10.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 45,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11
Kumho Ecsta PA51
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Potenza RE11 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PA51 if snow and treadwear matter most to you. Bridgestone Potenza RE11 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 78 vs 66 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 77 vs 68 on dry.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 62 vs 56 on snow.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 73 vs 68 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE11 or Ecsta PA51?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE11 or Ecsta PA51?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 73 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE11 or Ecsta PA51?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 77 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Potenza RE11 or Ecsta PA51?
Kumho Ecsta PA51, 62 vs 56 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Potenza RE11 or Ecsta PA51?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE11 or Ecsta PA51?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE11 or Ecsta PA51?
Kumho Ecsta PA51, 71 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology