Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 1 + 6,409 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
± 5

Tests 76 · 3 tests Owners 81 · 6,409 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (ice braking)

“I ran the dws on my 700whp corvette ZR1 for 5 years . Never a problem and wear really good . I’ve tracked them in the qtr mile and roll racing . They hooked pretty good ls at the track . Had a 1.60 sixty foot on them”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    80
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–76
    Reviews found online–87

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 87.2 = 80

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    81
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–75
    Reviews found online–91

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 91.4 = 81

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–80
    Reviews found online–71

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 80.3 + 40% × 71.3 = 77

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    80
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–75
    Reviews found online–83

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 40% × 74.7 + 60% × 83.4 = 80

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–71
    Reviews found online–79

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 79.3 = 75

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online–71

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    83
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Reviews found online–83
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFTContinental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Relative Score – 78
Dry – 80
Wet – 81
Snow – 77
Comfort – 80
Noise – 75
Treadwear – 69
Handling (owners) – 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE97AS RFT

± 5

ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE97AS RFT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Pros

  • Exceptional wet traction and resistance to hydroplaning
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality that transforms vehicle dynamics
  • Strong dry grip and responsive, predictable cornering capabilities

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter-than-expected lifespan for some drivers
  • Increased road noise and drone developing as the tires wear down
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a 'squishy' feel
All owner themes in the ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Positive

The community widely praises the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus as a top-tier ultra-high-performance all-season tire, often comparing it favorably to Michelin competitors. Users frequently highlight its exceptional wet traction, comfortable and quiet ride quality, and surprising winter capabilities for an all-season tire. While a few note softer sidewalls or minor balancing quirks, the overall consensus is overwhelmingly positive regarding daily driving performance and value.

r/TeslaLounge ·23 upvotes ·2025-10-18

“New Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus on 2023 MYP (pics + first impressions) After a summer of traveling to visit family and kids on AAU travel teams it was time for some new rubber. Looked down at my rears a few days ago and saw the threads on the inside of the right tire. I used the Tesla community here on Reddit and locked in on the DWS. PepBoys was able to get them in less than 24 hours and even offered a 10% discount. I definitely noticed a smoother ride so far and I would argue a bit more traction. I’ve only had them on for a day so I’ll have to see how much range loss I’ll experience and if they perform better or worse when pushed. I think for $1,500 dollars installed I didn’t do too bad. Plus I believe I have a quality replacement from the OEM that my MYP came with. Anyone else running the DWS06 Plus on their MYP? How’s your long-term wear or efficiency? Read more”

bobistheoilguy.com ·3 upvotes ·2025-01-17

“Yep the set on mine are approaching 5 yrs/50K miles since being put on and tread depth is averaging 4/32". Will be replacing them in the next few months and no doubt will go back with the same exact thing. Definitely the best performing/most even wearing tire I've had on any vehicle for decades regardless of brand.”

r/Porsche997 ·16 upvotes ·2026-10-14

“Got these for a steal I was looking for a 18 inch winter wheels set for my 997.1 S These came up and got them for $650 - full set with tires! Tires are Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus all-seasons - made in 0125 and have 90% thread on them. I was going to donate the tires and buy proper winter tires like Michelin Alpine, but google ai tells me these are better if the roads are clean so I might drive them when I put my summer tires away.”

Top themes
#Wet Weather Traction#Ride Comfort and Noise#Winter and Snow Performance#Handling and Grip#Tread Life and Longevity#Michelin Comparison#Value and Pricing

Based on 139 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—120
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—560 - 740 A - AA A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Only Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT
Tire B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology