Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 1 + 6,409 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 3 tests Owners 82 · 6,409 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (ice braking)
“I ran the dws on my 700whp corvette ZR1 for 5 years . Never a problem and wear really good . I’ve tracked them in the qtr mile and roll racing . They hooked pretty good ls at the track . Had a 1.60 sixty foot on them”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison80Why this score
Source Potenza RE97AS RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 88 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 87.7 = 80
-
–
Wet
No comparison82Why this score
Source Potenza RE97AS RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 92 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 91.7 = 82
-
–
Snow
No comparison77Why this score
Source Potenza RE97AS RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 80 Reviews found online – 72 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 80.4 + 40% × 72 = 77
-
–
Comfort
No comparison80Why this score
Source Potenza RE97AS RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 84 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 40% × 74.9 + 60% × 83.6 = 80
-
–
Noise
No comparison75Why this score
Source Potenza RE97AS RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 71 Reviews found online – 80 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 79.7 = 75
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison69Why this score
Source Potenza RE97AS RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online – 71 ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison83Why this score
Source Potenza RE97AS RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Reviews found online – 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 78 |
| Dry | – | 80 |
| Wet | – | 82 |
| Snow | – | 77 |
| Comfort | – | 80 |
| Noise | – | 75 |
| Treadwear | – | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE97AS RFT
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE97AS RFT
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Pros
- Exceptional wet traction and resistance to hydroplaning
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality that transforms vehicle dynamics
- Strong dry grip and responsive, predictable cornering capabilities
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter-than-expected lifespan for some drivers
- Increased road noise and drone developing as the tires wear down
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a 'squishy' feel
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
The community widely praises the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus as a top-tier ultra-high-performance all-season tire, often comparing it favorably to Michelin competitors. Users frequently highlight its exceptional wet traction, comfortable and quiet ride quality, and surprising winter capabilities for an all-season tire. While a few note softer sidewalls or minor balancing quirks, the overall consensus is overwhelmingly positive regarding daily driving performance and value.
“I've had PS4's on my last three cars. Great tires , but they do wear. I've also had two sets of PS4 All Seasons and been less than impressed, overall. After the advice of a significant number of people in various forums, I purchased a set of Continental Extreme Contact DWS 06 Plus, ultra high performance all seasons. These have exceeded all my expectations, and in the wet or dry, are so close to the standard PS4's that I was shocked. I even know of people occasionally tracking with them! Never in my life, prior to this, could I have imagined an "all season tire" ultra, or otherwise possibly being worthwhile, but I am blown away by the performance of these!”
“235s Factory Michelin Pilot Sport PS4s —> 245s Continental Extreme Contact DWS-06 Plus Just a quick first impression after changing from stock Summer tires 235/40/18 dimensions to 245/40/18 all season tires. I chose to take a chance and up the tire size/change the compound hoping to not sacrifice too much driving feel. As many are already aware, this 245 tire size is standard for the Morizo Edition*. Overall, I do not regret changing the tire size. Drive 9/10. Looks 10/10. A very small amount of steering feel was lost, but not enough to take away from the experience. If the car was a “track” setup I would stick with stickier performance tires or stock Michelins… but for a daily driver, the Continental Extreme Contact DWS-06 Plus tires in the 245/35/18 dimensions suits the GR Corolla MUCH better in my opinion. The drive is smoother just cruising (does not feel as bouncy over bumps) and tire noise is virtually non existent. The slightly larger sidewall also gives a little more peace of mind on crappy NY roads, pot holes etc. (I have had to plug the stock Michelins 4 times in the last 15 months). Will add more impressions later on if I can give more feedback. **Have not confirmed if speedo accuracy improved or got worse**”
“I’m running the Conti ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus (say that 3 times fast!) all seasons in MA. Last year was my first winter with them, passed with flying colors and much better than the Pirelli Scorpions on my F15 with the N55 and a light tune. If you’re running summer tires you’ll either want to swap for these for year round or go with a dedicated summer / winter setup. I don’t like going that route as you know we can have mild winter weeks or months in New England and I don’t want to be forced to drive on winter tires for half of the year waiting for winter to come.”
Based on 139 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT | B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 120 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 - 740 A - AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Only Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology