Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS vs Bridgestone Potenza S-02 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 21 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza S-02 leads, 64–61 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 21 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Potenza S-02 +468Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Potenza S-02 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 63 68 Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
Potenza S-02: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Potenza S-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
66
Wet
Level66Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Potenza S-02 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 64 64 Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 66
Potenza S-02: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Potenza S-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Snow
Potenza S-02 +561Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Potenza S-02 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 45 54 Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 45.1 = 56
Potenza S-02: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 61
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Potenza S-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
54
Comfort
Potenza S-02 +458Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Potenza S-02 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 46 53 Potenza RE980AS: 40% × 64.2 (est.) + 60% × 46.4 = 54
Potenza S-02: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.2 = 58
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Potenza S-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
62
Noise
Potenza RE980AS +161Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Potenza S-02 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 54 54 Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 62
Potenza S-02: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 61
No road tests of noise for Potenza RE980AS or Potenza S-02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Potenza S-02 +258Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Potenza S-02 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 49 52 Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
Potenza S-02: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza S-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
55
Handling (owners)
Potenza S-02 +1671Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Potenza S-02 Reviews found online 55 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS | Bridgestone Potenza S-02 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 64 |
| Dry | 64 | 68 |
| Wet | 66 | 66 |
| Snow | 56 | 61 |
| Comfort | 54 | 58 |
| Noise | 62 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE980AS
Potenza S-02
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE980AS
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and sporty handling characteristics
- Sharp and responsive initial turn-in
- Competitive pricing within the premium high-performance category
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tread wears down
- Poor snow and ice traction compared to other all-season options
- Stiffer sidewall impact comfort relative to competitors like Michelin
Tire B Potenza S-02
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and superior cornering performance
- Outstanding steering feedback, communication, and progressiveness
- Faithful reproduction of original equipment (OE) handling characteristics for sports cars like the Honda S2000
Cons
- Very rapid and sometimes extreme tread wear
- Poor performance and loss of traction in cold weather or below certain temperatures
- High noise levels and stiff ride compromising comfort
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS | B · Bridgestone Potenza S-02 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | 140 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS
Bridgestone Potenza S-02
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Potenza S-02 — better handling, snow and dry. Where the Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Potenza S-02 scores 71 vs 55 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza S-02 scores 61 vs 56 on snow.
Bridgestone Potenza S-02 scores 68 vs 64 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza S-02 scores 58 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE980AS or Potenza S-02?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE980AS or Potenza S-02?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE980AS or Potenza S-02?
Bridgestone Potenza S-02, 68 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Potenza RE980AS or Potenza S-02?
Bridgestone Potenza S-02, 61 vs 56 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Potenza RE980AS or Potenza S-02?
Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 61 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE980AS or Potenza S-02?
Bridgestone Potenza S-02, 58 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE980AS or Potenza S-02?
Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 58 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology