Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 19 road tests and 11 + 3,376 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Potenza S007A and Ventus S1 evo3 are level at 68.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests 77 · 19 tests Owners 57 · 3,376 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza S007A | Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests | ≈ 68 (est.) | 86 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 60 |
Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 68
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.6 + 40% × 59.8 = 75
No road tests of dry for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Potenza S007A | Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests | ≈ 69 (est.) | 90 |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 68 |
Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 89.6 + 40% × 68 = 81
No road tests of wet for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Potenza S007A | Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests | ≈ 68 (est.) | 64 |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 56 |
Potenza S007A: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.6 = 65
Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.4 + 60% × 55.8 = 59
No road tests of comfort for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Potenza S007A | Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests | – | 77 |
| Reviews found online | – | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Potenza S007A | Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests | 70 | 61 |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 42 |
Potenza S007A: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 64.5 = 68
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.8 + 40% × 41.5 = 53
| Source | Potenza S007A | Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 75 | 59 |
| Source | Potenza S007A | Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests | – | 68 |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S007A | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 68 |
| Dry | 68 | 75 |
| Wet | 68 | 81 |
| Comfort | 65 | 59 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 59 |
| Efficiency | – | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza S007A
Ventus S1 evo3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza S007A | Ventus S1 evo3 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | #6/8 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.
“I had Hankook tires on my XKR, and thought they were the noisiest tires I had ever heard on a car, and I had to get rid of them as I couldn't stand it.”
“So, I was conversing on a Canadian EV group on Facebook and someone said their SE arrived with run flats…Hankook Ventus S1 evo3. My Mini also has Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 and I was not aware they are considered run flats. So I looked them up online and it appears that in 205/45R17 XL it says Run Flat…Y on . Was anyone else aware of this? Should it say run flat somewhere on the tire?”
“Which tire should I choose? I’m currently looking for new summer tires, but this time I’m finding it surprisingly difficult to choose. My previous set were Bridgestone T005s, which honestly didn’t impress me much. On my earlier car I’ve driven on Michelin PS4S, Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3, and Pirelli (don’t remember the exact model). The Michelins were by far my favorite — excellent grip and overall a fantastic tire. The Hankooks were above average and perfectly fine, but the Pirellis were a big disappointment. This time I’m considering the following three options: • Michelin Pilot Sport 5 • Continental SportContact 7 • Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 If I hadn’t done any research, I would have gone for the Michelins without hesitation. However, after digging a bit deeper, I added the Continentals as a strong competitor, and the Kumhos because they’re significantly cheaper while still getting quite positive reviews. I drive a Cupra Formentor 2.0 AWD with around 430 hp. I never take the car to the track, but I do enjoy sporty driving and quick launches at traffic lights. Now I’m finding the final decision harder than expected. Taking both price and performance into account, which of these three would you recommend? Read more”
Based on 33 community posts
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S007A | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 110 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 20″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 - 420 A - AA A |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Bridgestone Potenza S007A
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza S007A and Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza S007A is stronger on handling, treadwear and comfort. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 is stronger on wet and dry. Bridgestone Potenza S007A rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Potenza S007A scores 75 vs 59 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza S007A scores 68 vs 53 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 81 vs 68 on wet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 75 vs 68 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 81 vs 68 on our wet score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 75 vs 68 on our dry score.
Bridgestone Potenza S007A, 65 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Bridgestone Potenza S007A, 68 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology