Bridgestone Sporty Style MY02 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Sporty Style MY02 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 7 road tests and 8 + 2,365 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta HS52 is ahead, 78–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Tire BKumho

Ecsta HS52

Summer

Tests 82 · 7 tests Owners 70 · 2,365 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I have kuhmo ecsta hs52's on my renault megane during spring and summer and they are really good. No complaints at all. My milage did go up a little bit but that's it”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Ecsta HS52 +24
    81
    Why this score
    SourceSporty Style MY02Ecsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 61 (est.)86
    Reviews found online5075

    Sporty Style MY02: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 57

    Ecsta HS52: 60% × 85.8 + 40% × 74.7 = 81

    No road tests of dry for Sporty Style MY02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 56

    Wet

    Ecsta HS52 +26
    82
    Why this score
    SourceSporty Style MY02Ecsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 59 (est.)88
    Reviews found online5172

    Sporty Style MY02: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 50.9 = 56

    Ecsta HS52: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 71.6 = 82

    No road tests of wet for Sporty Style MY02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 59

    Comfort

    Ecsta HS52 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSporty Style MY02Ecsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4960

    Sporty Style MY02: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.5 = 59

    Ecsta HS52: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Sporty Style MY02 or Ecsta HS52. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSporty Style MY02Ecsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–64
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Ecsta HS52: 60% × 63.8 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 65

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta HS52. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 58

    Treadwear

    Ecsta HS52 +15
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSporty Style MY02Ecsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 61 (est.)78
    Reviews found online5266

    Sporty Style MY02: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 58

    Ecsta HS52: 60% × 77.9 + 40% × 66 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Sporty Style MY02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta HS52 +24
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSporty Style MY02Ecsta HS52
    Reviews found online5175
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Sporty Style MY02 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Sporty Style MY02Kumho Ecsta HS52
Relative Score 57 78
Dry 57 81
Wet 56 82
Comfort 59 65
Noise – 65
Treadwear 58 73
Handling (owners) 51 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Sporty Style MY02

Ecsta HS52

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Sporty Style MY02

Pros

  • Strong dry pavement grip and predictable handling characteristics
  • High value-for-money ratio, particularly when found at clearance pricing
  • Manageable breakaway behavior that provides adequate warning to the driver

Cons

  • Poor wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Lack of ride comfort and refinement
  • Inconsistent performance on rear-wheel-drive platforms
All owner themes in the Sporty Style MY02 review

Tire B Ecsta HS52

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry weather traction
  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • A few reports of accelerated or abnormal tread wear
  • Slightly sensitive to tire pressure regarding comfort
  • Occasional complaints of high-speed vibration or imbalance early on
All owner themes in the Ecsta HS52 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Sporty Style MY02

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Mixed

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 receives a polarized mix of reviews from the community, praised by many for its rigid sidewalls, strong dry grip, sharp steering responsiveness, and great value compared to premium alternatives. However, some users report disappointing wet weather performance, potential issues with aquaplaning resistance, and inconsistent test results across different sizes. Overall, it is viewed as a solid mid-range option, though experiences with wet traction and longevity vary significantly among drivers.

Top themes
#Dry grip and handling#Wet weather performance#Sidewall stiffness#Price and value#Comparison with competitors#Fuel economy and weight#Tread wear and durability

Based on 17 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Sporty Style MY02 B · Kumho Ecsta HS52
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—53
Rim diameters—14″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Sporty Style MY02

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Winner: Kumho Ecsta HS52 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Sporty Style MY02 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores 82 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores 81 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores 75 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores 73 vs 58 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Sporty Style MY02
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta HS52

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Sporty Style MY02 or Ecsta HS52?

Which is better in the wet, Sporty Style MY02 or Ecsta HS52?

Kumho Ecsta HS52, 82 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Sporty Style MY02 or Ecsta HS52?

Kumho Ecsta HS52, 81 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Sporty Style MY02 or Ecsta HS52?

Kumho Ecsta HS52, 65 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Sporty Style MY02 or Ecsta HS52?

Kumho Ecsta HS52, 73 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology