Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 31 + 7 road tests and 1,871 + 2,365 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ahead, 90–78
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 94 · 31 tests Owners 84 · 1,871 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”
Tests 84 · 7 tests Owners 74 · 2,365 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)
“I have kuhmo ecsta hs52's on my renault megane during spring and summer and they are really good. No complaints at all. My milage did go up a little bit but that's it”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / 7 tests | 96 | 86 |
| Reviews found online | 92 | 79 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.1 + 40% × 92.1 = 95
Ecsta HS52: 60% × 86.4 + 40% × 78.7 = 83
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / 7 tests | 94 | 90 |
| Reviews found online | 92 | 77 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 93.6 + 40% × 91.7 = 93
Ecsta HS52: 60% × 89.9 + 40% × 76.5 = 85
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 66 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 40% × 76.2 + 60% × 81.3 = 79
Ecsta HS52: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta HS52. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 3 tests | 94 | 64 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 94 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 83
Ecsta HS52: 60% × 63.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 65
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or Ecsta HS52. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 5 tests | 97 | 80 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 67 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.5 + 40% × 69.1 = 86
Ecsta HS52: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 67.2 = 75
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 90 | 77 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 5 tests | 72 | 43 |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Kumho Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 90 | 78 |
| Dry | 95 | 83 |
| Wet | 93 | 85 |
| Comfort | 79 | 67 |
| Noise | 83 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 90 | 77 |
| Efficiency | 72 | 43 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Ecsta HS52
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ecsta HS52 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #13/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 95% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 90% #5/7 · 2026 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 86% #12/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 97% #5/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 92% #7/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 97% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking (concrete) | Wet | 96% #4/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 90% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 97% #3/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 91% #15/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #4/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 96% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 100% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 59% #12/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 99% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 75% #8/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 95% #13/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 93% #15/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 84% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 88% #16/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 65% #9/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | 77% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #6/10 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | #12/20 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 83% #4/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | #9/16 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinion on the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is largely positive, with drivers praising its high performance, dry and wet road manners, competitive pricing, and overall capability as a daily and spirited driving tyre. Some users raise concerns regarding ride firmness, high-speed vibration issues, rapid wear under track conditions, and compromised grip in cold wet temperatures as noted in Scandinavian testing. Compatibility discussions also frequently centre on EV suitability, Porsche N-ratings, and rim protection markings.
“you could fit them but they are not NF rated, only 5 is NF0 and NF1 rated but on the 21" sized for the sedan.”
“im on my 4th set of goodyear eagle f1 asymmetric 6 and i will never go back to other brands or models. i use them on my e220d estate and as a job im uber driver and do about 7000 miles a month.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by Toothadash Hi guys thanks for your input and sharing what you are using. I have gone for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with 20% off so worked out around £150 each fitted. You'll not go wrong with those; superb tyres and loved them on our F31 when I ran 2 sets of wheels”
Based on 28 community posts
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 receives a polarized mix of reviews from the community, praised by many for its rigid sidewalls, strong dry grip, sharp steering responsiveness, and great value compared to premium alternatives. However, some users report disappointing wet weather performance, potential issues with aquaplaning resistance, and inconsistent test results across different sizes. Overall, it is viewed as a solid mid-range option, though experiences with wet traction and longevity vary significantly among drivers.
“Bad i have hs52 on my audi a3 8l quattro 1.8t i have no grip with rain.. Like cant corner fast it just goes straight... Dry its fine but wet forget it. My oncle has the same experience with kuhmo on his bmw 118 diesel he got some rims and they had pretty good threats kumho on it. He said all it wanted was to drift and spin out. He said a couple of times it did a 180 he said never again i said same don't trust my car with these tyres. Im gonna get some new rim 17" and Goodyear asymmetric 6. To replace my 16" stock rims with kumho... I have had bad tyres but never this bad. Like 1 ere prix were even better in my Mercedes even doh they became ovals.”
“I have kuhmo ecsta hs52's on my renault megane during spring and summer and they are really good. No complaints at all. My milage did go up a little bit but that's it”
“What’s up with these tyres? Kumho ectsa hs52 date code 3923, tyres are (UK) legal regards tread but I can’t imagine this damage is normal. Both front tyres have this, looks like the tread is tearing apart in multiple places. I did not fit these tyres but it was mot’d 3 months ago and has done 2k miles since. I’ve owned the car 11 months but only noticed this very recently. I am getting them replaced on Monday with little use before then but I’m curious how this has happened. Is it just a shit brand? Wear is even across the face so I don’t think it would be the alignment or anything to do with the car and the damage is random across the contact patch. It’s a Peugeot 508 2l diesel so quite a bit of weight on the nose. Fitting Bridgestone Turanza 6. Rear tyres are good, but a different brand (horizon horace 2122 date)”
Based on 17 community posts
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | B · Kumho Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 130 | 53 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 23″ | 14″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 7 - 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 260 - 300 AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 30,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 19 | 19 |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better efficiency, noise and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 72 vs 43 on efficiency.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 83 vs 65 on noise.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 90 vs 77 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 95 vs 83 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 93 vs 85 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 95 vs 83 on our dry score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 83 vs 65 on our noise score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 79 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 86 vs 75 on our treadwear score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 72 vs 43 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
