Head-to-head Updated

Pirelli Powergy vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 7 road tests and 1,809 + 2,372 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta HS52 is ahead, 79–68

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pirelli Powergy
Tire APirelli

Powergy

Summer

± 6

Tests 77 · 1 test Owners 59 · 1,809 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test (noise)

“Pirelli cinturato P7 and Pirelli Powergy Hi all 👋🏼 So I had 4 Pirelli Cinturato P7’s on my Ford Focus ST. I got a flat tire (front left) while I was on vacation so I decided to get 2 new tires at the front. I asked the guy at the tire shop to get the same tires (so the Pirelli Cinturato’s). He got me Pirelli Powergy’s instead… He didn’t really speak English and there was not time as I was driving home the next day. So I just accepted it. Now my question is what’s the main difference between these tires? And does it matter I got 2 different tires now? (2 powergy’s at the front and 2 Cinturato’s at the back) Thanks!🙏🏼”

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Tire BKumho

Ecsta HS52

Summer

± 5

Tests 84 · 7 tests Owners 74 · 2,372 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I have kuhmo ecsta hs52's on my renault megane during spring and summer and they are really good. No complaints at all. My milage did go up a little bit but that's it”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Ecsta HS52 +12
    83
    Why this score
    SourcePowergyEcsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests7786
    Reviews found online6379

    Powergy: 60% × 77.2 + 40% × 62.5 = 71

    Ecsta HS52: 60% × 86.4 + 40% × 78.7 = 83

  2. 72

    Wet

    Ecsta HS52 +13
    85
    Why this score
    SourcePowergyEcsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests7690
    Reviews found online6577

    Powergy: 60% × 76 + 40% × 65 = 72

    Ecsta HS52: 60% × 89.9 + 40% × 76.5 = 85

  3. 63

    Comfort

    Ecsta HS52 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePowergyEcsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests74≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5666

    Powergy: 40% × 73.9 + 60% × 55.6 = 63

    Ecsta HS52: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta HS52. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 75

    Noise

    Powergy +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePowergyEcsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests8064
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    Powergy: 60% × 79.9 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 75

    Ecsta HS52: 60% × 63.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 65

    No owner ratings of noise for Powergy or Ecsta HS52. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 57

    Treadwear

    Ecsta HS52 +18
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePowergyEcsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 61 (est.)80
    Reviews found online5167

    Powergy: 60% × 60.7 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 57

    Ecsta HS52: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 67.1 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for Powergy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta HS52 +15
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePowergyEcsta HS52
    Reviews found online6277
  7. 74

    Efficiency

    Powergy +31
    43
    Why this score
    SourcePowergyEcsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests7443
Scores at a glance
Pirelli Powergy vs Kumho Ecsta HS52: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryPirelli PowergyKumho Ecsta HS52
Relative Score 68 79
Dry 71 83
Wet 72 85
Comfort 63 67
Noise 75 65
Treadwear 57 75
Handling (owners) 62 77
Efficiency 74 43

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Powergy

± 5

Ecsta HS52

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPowergyEcsta HS52ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 94% #4/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test 95% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 81% #8/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test 86% #12/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 92% #4/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test 97% #5/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 96% #5/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test 97% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 98% #3/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test 91% #15/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 97% #2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test 99% #2/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test 96% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 81% #5/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test 88% #16/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/10 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test #9/16 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Powergy

Pros

  • Significantly reduced road noise and quiet highway ride
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting
  • Comfortable and smooth ride quality compared to run-flats

Cons

  • Faster than average tread wear or shallow initial tread depth
  • Negative impact on fuel economy (MPG) for some users
  • Soft sidewalls leading to muted steering feedback and less precise handling at the limit
All owner themes in the Powergy review

Tire B Ecsta HS52

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry weather traction
  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • A few reports of accelerated or abnormal tread wear
  • Slightly sensitive to tire pressure regarding comfort
  • Occasional complaints of high-speed vibration or imbalance early on
All owner themes in the Ecsta HS52 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Pirelli Powergy

Mixed

Community opinions on the Pirelli Powergy are mixed, with some viewing them as a budget-friendly or decent mid-tier option for daily driving and fuel economy, while others criticize them as a lower-tier eco line compared to Pirelli's premium offerings like the Cinturato or P-Zero. Drivers report mixed experiences regarding ride comfort, and the tires are frequently discussed by owners dealing with mismatched tire setups after unexpected replacements.

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2025-05-18

“Pirelli cinturato P7 and Pirelli Powergy Hi all 👋🏼 So I had 4 Pirelli Cinturato P7’s on my Ford Focus ST. I got a flat tire (front left) while I was on vacation so I decided to get 2 new tires at the front. I asked the guy at the tire shop to get the same tires (so the Pirelli Cinturato’s). He got me Pirelli Powergy’s instead… He didn’t really speak English and there was not time as I was driving home the next day. So I just accepted it. Now my question is what’s the main difference between these tires? And does it matter I got 2 different tires now? (2 powergy’s at the front and 2 Cinturato’s at the back) Thanks!🙏🏼”

r/mazda3 ·1 upvote ·2026-10-05

“Avg 29mpg on a 2015 Mazda 3 Sport Nav 2L 165bhp, any ideas? I've had this car for about 3-4 weeks now, posted it here on this subreddit too. So far, I've done about 800 miles and my average fuel consumtion seems to be around 29mpg - 10.2L/100km. The car doesn't have its original rims, its on **MAM RS3** 18" rims with Pirelli Powergy tires 215/45/R18 (internet says these tires provide good fuel economy). On longer trips the average is about 40mpg-45mpg which still seems a bit high. My work commute is about 2 miles, and I do occasionally drive in a spirited manner. Is this okay? Thank you all!”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2026-08-31

“Ripples in side wall Just been washing the car and found what I can only describe as ripples in the side wall of my front-right tyre. Had these fitted in June, only just noticed the ripples. The other tyres are perfect. I’ve probably done around 2,000 miles on them. Should I be concerned, and do they look like a manufacturing defect, or as a result of damage? (I’ve not hit any serious potholes that I’m aware of). These tyres are Pirelli Powergy, fitted to a Volvo XC60. Date code is 3325. Any help gratefully received. Read more”

Top themes
#budget eco tire line#mismatched tire setups#fuel economy and efficiency#daily driving performance#comparison to cinturato series#ride comfort and vibrations#wet and winter grip

Based on 18 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Mixed

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 receives a polarized mix of reviews from the community, praised by many for its rigid sidewalls, strong dry grip, sharp steering responsiveness, and great value compared to premium alternatives. However, some users report disappointing wet weather performance, potential issues with aquaplaning resistance, and inconsistent test results across different sizes. Overall, it is viewed as a solid mid-range option, though experiences with wet traction and longevity vary significantly among drivers.

r/Mazda323 ·6 upvotes ·2026-06-14

“Mini review of the Kumho Ecsta HS52 I was running some Hankook's on my GT before and the tire wall not stiff enough. Now I've mounted these Kumho Ecsta HS52's and I highly recommend them: The tire wall is nicely rigid and they grip great in the dry, took quite some intent to make them loose traction. Additionally, I've accidentally ran over a pretty big sharp looking rock at decent speed that aimed right in a tread groove (thinnest part) and the thing shrugged it off no problem. And all of this for a damn good price too! So if anyone's looking for good tires, now you know.”

r/tires ·3 upvotes ·2025-09-23

“What’s up with these tyres? Kumho ectsa hs52 date code 3923, tyres are (UK) legal regards tread but I can’t imagine this damage is normal. Both front tyres have this, looks like the tread is tearing apart in multiple places. I did not fit these tyres but it was mot’d 3 months ago and has done 2k miles since. I’ve owned the car 11 months but only noticed this very recently. I am getting them replaced on Monday with little use before then but I’m curious how this has happened. Is it just a shit brand? Wear is even across the face so I don’t think it would be the alignment or anything to do with the car and the damage is random across the contact patch. It’s a Peugeot 508 2l diesel so quite a bit of weight on the nose. Fitting Bridgestone Turanza 6. Rear tyres are good, but a different brand (horizon horace 2122 date)”

r/CarTalkUK ·1 upvote ·2025-01-11

“I have kuhmo ecsta hs52's on my renault megane during spring and summer and they are really good. No complaints at all. My milage did go up a little bit but that's it”

Top themes
#Dry grip and handling#Wet weather performance#Sidewall stiffness#Price and value#Comparison with competitors#Fuel economy and weight#Tread wear and durability

Based on 17 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Pirelli Powergy B · Kumho Ecsta HS52
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available8753
Rim diameters15″ – 21″14″ – 20″
Sizes in common3838

Which one should you actually buy?

Pirelli Powergy

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Winner: Kumho Ecsta HS52 — better treadwear, handling and wet. Pick the Pirelli Powergy if efficiency and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Pirelli Powergy scores 74 vs 43 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores 75 vs 57 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores 77 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores 85 vs 72 on wet.

Tire A · Pirelli Powergy
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta HS52

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Powergy or Ecsta HS52?

Which is better in the wet, Powergy or Ecsta HS52?

Kumho Ecsta HS52, 85 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Powergy or Ecsta HS52?

Kumho Ecsta HS52, 83 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Powergy or Ecsta HS52?

Pirelli Powergy, 75 vs 65 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Powergy or Ecsta HS52?

Kumho Ecsta HS52, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Powergy or Ecsta HS52?

Kumho Ecsta HS52, 75 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Powergy or Ecsta HS52?

Pirelli Powergy, 74 vs 43 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology