Tests – · none yet Owners 28 · 25 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Supercat vs Kumho Ecowing ES31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 9,931 owner reviews. How we score
Ecowing ES31 is ahead, 63–38
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 9,931 reviews
“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
37
Dry
Ecowing ES31 +2764Why this score
Source Supercat Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 48 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 20 62 Supercat: 60% × 48 (est.) + 40% × 19.6 = 37
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64
No road tests of dry for Supercat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
34
Wet
Ecowing ES31 +2963Why this score
Source Supercat Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 44 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 21 60 Supercat: 60% × 43.5 (est.) + 40% × 20.9 = 34
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
No road tests of wet for Supercat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
44
Comfort
Ecowing ES31 +1963Why this score
Source Supercat Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 32 61 Supercat: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32.1 = 44
Ecowing ES31: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.8 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Supercat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
51
Treadwear
Ecowing ES31 +1566Why this score
Source Supercat Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 42 65 Supercat: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 41.7 = 51
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Supercat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
25
Handling (owners)
Ecowing ES31 +3055Why this score
Source Supercat Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 25 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Supercat | Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 38 | 63 |
| Dry | 37 | 64 |
| Wet | 34 | 63 |
| Comfort | 44 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 51 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 25 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
38
/ 100
Supercat
63
/ 100
Ecowing ES31
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Supercat
Pros
- High tread durability and long service life
- Quiet road noise levels
- Affordable price point
Cons
- Extremely poor wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- Soft, unresponsive sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback
- Significant loss of traction during cornering and acceleration
Tire B Ecowing ES31
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium brand alternatives
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort over bumps and speed humps
- Improved fuel economy and reduced rolling resistance
Cons
- Polarizing wet weather performance, with some users reporting frightening losses of traction
- Soft sidewalls that can feel vague during quick lane changes or lead to vulnerability against curbs and potholes
- Occasional reports of accelerated or uneven tread wear on outer shoulders
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Supercat
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Ecowing ES31
The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.
r/carros
·8 upvotes ·2026-03-04
“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2025-11-05
“The EU label is all over the place. But none have A-A-A as far as I can tell. Did not score good in wet in the test on the site. Wear rate on a Mazda 2 should be decent with almost anything. Why not look at all seasons? Sava All weather and Kumho Solus are closest to the ES31 in price.”
r/CarsAustralia
·2 upvotes ·2026-07-05
“ES31s are fine, they're your usual budget tyre. Certainly not meant for any spirited driving or for sport type cars. I've had them before on the front my my Yaris and they were acceptable, got maybe 40,000km out of them.”
Top themes
#Cost effectiveness and value#Wet weather grip#Treadwear and durability#Budget tier limitations#Urban commuting suitability
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Supercat | B · Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 39 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
38
/ 100
Bridgestone Supercat
63
/ 100
Kumho Ecowing ES31
Winner: Kumho Ecowing ES31 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 55 vs 25 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 63 vs 34 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 64 vs 37 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 63 vs 44 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Supercat
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES31
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Supercat or Ecowing ES31?
Which is better in the wet, Supercat or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 63 vs 34 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Supercat or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 64 vs 37 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Supercat or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 63 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Supercat or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 66 vs 51 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology