Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 15 + 32 road tests and 2,618 + 21,600 owner reviews. How we score
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Bridgestone Turanza 6 cracked and perished within 18 months. 9k miles and 6mm of tread and all four of my Bridgestone Turanza 6 (summer) tyres have perished and cracked. Now an advisory on my MOT. This can't be normal can it? So any way, I'm looking for recommendations.”
Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)
“CC2 is a super safe way to go, I’d just keep on with them if you’re happy so far. Other options probably won’t last as long or have as good traction in the occasional snow/ice. I have a set of 18” wheels so I use 235/60R18 tires and rotate them, live in the northeast, lots of snow in winter. I’ve used Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive, they were great, lasted a bit over 40k miles until they got down to just over 2/16th. I’m on Bridgestone UltraWeather now, feel fantastic so far, slightly better efficiency than WeatherActives, slightly quieter too. They’re basically a next gen version of WeatherPeak but in an XL load rating which the ID.4 specifies.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
78
Dry
CrossClimate 2 +17
95
Why this score
Source
Turanza 6
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 30 tests
79
99
Reviews found online
77
89
Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0
100%
96%
Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0
100%
99%
Turanza 6:60% × 78.9 + 40% × 76.8 = 78
CrossClimate 2:60% × 99.1 + 40% × 88.5 = 95
82
Wet
CrossClimate 2 +5
87
Why this score
Source
Turanza 6
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 30 tests
82
83
Reviews found online
82
92
Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0
100%
81%
Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0
98%
96%
Wet Lateral Stability (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0
100%
95%
Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1
90%
96%
Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1
98%
99%
Turanza 6:60% × 82.1 + 40% × 82.4 = 82
CrossClimate 2:60% × 83.4 + 40% × 91.8 = 87
–
Snow
No comparison
91
Why this score
Source
Turanza 6
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests
–
99
Reviews found online
–
78
Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1
30%
98%
Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1
15%
98%
CrossClimate 2:60% × 98.9 + 40% × 78.4 = 91
74
Comfort
CrossClimate 2 +4
78
Why this score
Source
Turanza 6
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests
75
65
Reviews found online
73
87
Turanza 6:40% × 75.4 + 60% × 73 = 74
CrossClimate 2:40% × 65.1 + 60% × 86.5 = 78
73
Noise
CrossClimate 2 +7
80
Why this score
Source
Turanza 6
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 19 tests
77
79
Reviews found online
≈ 67 (est.)
83
Exterior Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0
98%
89%
Turanza 6:60% × 77 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
CrossClimate 2:60% × 78.6 + 40% × 82.7 = 80
No owner ratings of noise for Turanza 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
74
Treadwear
CrossClimate 2 +9
83
Why this score
Source
Turanza 6
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 7 tests
82
81
Reviews found online
63
87
Turanza 6:60% × 82.1 + 40% × 62.5 = 74
CrossClimate 2:60% × 81.1 + 40% × 87 = 83
76
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate 2 +6
82
Why this score
Source
Turanza 6
CrossClimate 2
Reviews found online
76
82
88
Efficiency
CrossClimate 2 +2
90
Why this score
Source
Turanza 6
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 22 tests
88
90
Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0
100%
86%
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Relative Score
77
86
Dry
78
95
Wet
82
87
Snow
–
91
Comfort
74
78
Noise
73
80
Treadwear
74
83
Handling (owners)
76
82
Efficiency
88
90
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
± 4
Turanza 6
86
/ 100
± 4
CrossClimate 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Turanza 6 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin CrossClimate 2 1 times.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Mixed
Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Turanza 6 is mixed to moderately positive, with owners often praising its competitive pricing, low rolling resistance, and dependable wet and dry grip. However, opinions diverge sharply on ride comfort and cabin noise, with some praising its quietness while others report harshness or road roar. Additionally, several drivers voice frustration over steering feedback, describing a soft or twitchy sensation, along with isolated reports of premature cracking.
#Cabin noise levels#Ride comfort and softness#Wet and dry grip#Rolling resistance efficiency#Price to performance value#Steering feel and stability#Tread wear and cracking
Based on 35 community posts
Tire B
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Positive
The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design
Based on 762 community posts
Specs side by side
Attribute
A · Bridgestone Turanza 6
B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
Category
Summer
All Season
Vehicle type
Passenger Car / Crossover
Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available
148
92
Rim diameters
15″ – 22″
15″ – 21″
Tread depth
8/32″
9 - 10/32″
UTQG
320 A A
640 B A
Treadwear warranty
—
60,000 mi
Sidewall
Blackwall
Black Side Wall
Max pressure
51 psi
50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common
67
67
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza 6
86
/ 100
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better dry, treadwear and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire BYou want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 78 on dry.
Pick tire BYou want the longest tread life
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 83 vs 74 on treadwear.
Pick tire BYou want a quieter cabin
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 80 vs 73 on noise.
Pick tire BYou enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 82 vs 76 on handling.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology