Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Turanza EL41 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 1 + 2,532 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,532 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison79Why this score
Source Turanza EL41 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests – 83 Reviews found online – 73 Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73.2 = 79
-
–
Wet
No comparison77Why this score
Source Turanza EL41 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests – 79 Reviews found online – 75 Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.6 = 77
-
–
Comfort
No comparison69Why this score
Source Turanza EL41 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 70 Reviews found online – 67 Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.4 = 69
-
–
Noise
No comparison61Why this score
Source Turanza EL41 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 58 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison74Why this score
Source Turanza EL41 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests – 79 Reviews found online – 67 Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison72Why this score
Source Turanza EL41 Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online – 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison84Why this score
Source Turanza EL41 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 84
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza EL41 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 75 |
| Dry | – | 79 |
| Wet | – | 77 |
| Comfort | – | 69 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | – | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Turanza EL41
75
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza EL41
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Turanza EL41
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
r/TireQuestions
·1 upvote ·2026-10-09
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
r/croautomobili
·1 upvote ·2026-09-23
“Top top top guma, stavio prosle godine kad sam kupio auto, odmah na Kupres isao, snijega i leda bilo dosta, ali izdale me nisu Imam i ljetne hankook ventus prime 4 isto odlicna guma”
r/TyreReviews
·4 upvotes ·2024-03-19
“Are there any Hankook Ventus Prime 4 longevity reviews (perhaps personal experience?) The only info I was able to find is Autobild 2022 and 2024, and ADAC 2024 reviews. In the first one they expect 39k km, in the second 26k and in ADAC - 50k. I'm not sure what to believe. I'm a fairly moderate user and will be replacing stock Primacy 3s which lasted around 45k km. I would like to have something that will last around 4-5 years, which at my current usage would be around 30-35k km. If they consistently fall short of it I would probably pay a premium for a more expensive brand, but reviews give very different figures. If ADAC figures is to be trusted I would surely get them, because I would probably replace the car before I have to put on new tires. But 26k km in the latest Autobild review falls short of my expectations a bit. Are those figures typically less than real life due to more extensive testing and usage? I'm driving a compact SUV with 50/50 city highway driving and no sporty aspirations, very default usage scenario. I could pay more and get goodyear efficientgrip performance 2, but at their longevity they will probably need to be replaced out of age before I wear them down realistically, so that's why I was initially settling in more midrange priced Hankook offering. Would love any help, and appreciate the help I received in my previous post! Read more”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza EL41 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 - 420 A A |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza EL41
75
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Only Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza EL41
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology