Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 25 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza ER33 vs Kumho Ecsta PS31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ecsta PS31 is ahead, 65–54
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 259 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
54
Dry
Ecsta PS31 +1064Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Ecsta PS31 Reviews found online 46 63 -
51
Wet
Ecsta PS31 +1869Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Ecsta PS31 Reviews found online 44 68 -
48
Snow
Ecsta PS31 +1058Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Ecsta PS31 Reviews found online 34 50 -
56
Comfort
Ecsta PS31 +1167Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Ecsta PS31 Reviews found online 43 65 -
60
Noise
Ecsta PS31 +767Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Ecsta PS31 Reviews found online 50 66 -
64
Treadwear
Ecsta PS31 +165Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Ecsta PS31 Reviews found online 64 65 -
46
Handling
Ecsta PS31 +2167Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Ecsta PS31 Reviews found online 46 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER33 | Kumho Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 54 | 65 |
| Dry | 54 | 64 |
| Wet | 51 | 69 |
| Snow | 48 | 58 |
| Comfort | 56 | 67 |
| Noise | 60 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 65 |
| Handling | 46 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Turanza ER33
Ecsta PS31
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER33
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Reliable dry-weather grip and handling
- Stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- High levels of cabin and road noise
- Poor wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Mediocre ride comfort and impact absorption
Tire B Ecsta PS31
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
- Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER33 | B · Kumho Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 12 | 21 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 19″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 140 A A | 460 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza ER33
Kumho Ecsta PS31
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 67 vs 46 on handling.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 69 vs 51 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 67 vs 56 on comfort.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 64 vs 54 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.