Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive vs Laufenn G FIT AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Turanza EverDrive is ahead, 68–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive

Turanza EverDrive

All-Season tire

± 11Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #1 of 7 in Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) (ice braking)

Laufenn G FIT AS
Tire BLaufenn

G FIT AS

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Turanza EverDrive +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza EverDriveG FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6757

    Turanza EverDrive: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    G FIT AS: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Turanza EverDrive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Turanza EverDrive +13
    59
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza EverDriveG FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7355

    Turanza EverDrive: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    G FIT AS: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    No road tests of wet for Turanza EverDrive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Snow

    Turanza EverDrive +8
    59
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza EverDriveG FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6451

    Turanza EverDrive: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 67

    G FIT AS: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Turanza EverDrive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Turanza EverDrive +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza EverDriveG FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6759

    Turanza EverDrive: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 66.6 = 67

    G FIT AS: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59.2 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Turanza EverDrive or G FIT AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza EverDriveG FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests69–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Turanza EverDrive: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 68

    No owner ratings of noise for Turanza EverDrive. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Turanza EverDrive +12
    55
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza EverDriveG FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6747

    Turanza EverDrive: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67

    G FIT AS: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza EverDrive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    59
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza EverDriveG FIT AS
    Reviews found online–59
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive vs Laufenn G FIT AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza EverDriveLaufenn G FIT AS
Relative Score 68 59
Dry 67 61
Wet 72 59
Snow 67 59
Comfort 67 62
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 67 55
Handling (owners) – 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 11

Turanza EverDrive

± 8

G FIT AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza EverDrive

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B G FIT AS

Pros

  • Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Decent dry pavement grip and handling

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
  • Inadequate winter and snow performance
  • Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
All owner themes in the G FIT AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive B · Laufenn G FIT AS
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available361
Rim diameters16″ – 20″16″
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG800 B B—
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive

Laufenn G FIT AS

Winner: Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive — better wet, treadwear and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Laufenn G FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive scores 72 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive scores 67 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive scores 67 vs 59 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive scores 67 vs 61 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive
Tire B · Laufenn G FIT AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Turanza EverDrive or G FIT AS?

Which is better in the wet, Turanza EverDrive or G FIT AS?

Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive, 72 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza EverDrive or G FIT AS?

Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive, 67 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Turanza EverDrive or G FIT AS?

Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive, 67 vs 59 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Turanza EverDrive or G FIT AS?

Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive, 67 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Turanza EverDrive or G FIT AS?

Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive, 67 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology