Bridgestone Turanza GR80 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza GR80 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 23 road tests and 6 + 6,538 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 90–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 5

Summer

± 4

Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 87 · 6,538 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))

“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 56

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 5 +36
    92
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza GR80Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests≈ 60 (est.)93
    Reviews found online5090

    Turanza GR80: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.7 = 56

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 93.2 + 40% × 90.2 = 92

    No road tests of dry for Turanza GR80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 5 +31
    94
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza GR80Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests≈ 65 (est.)94
    Reviews found online6093

    Turanza GR80: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 63

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 93.7 + 40% × 93.3 = 94

    No road tests of wet for Turanza GR80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 5 +16
    78
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza GR80Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 67 (est.)71
    Reviews found online5983

    Turanza GR80: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 58.6 = 62

    Pilot Sport 5: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 83.4 = 78

    No road tests of comfort for Turanza GR80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    47
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza GR80Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests–33
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 47

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 55

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 5 +31
    86
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza GR80Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 60 (est.)92
    Reviews found online4878

    Turanza GR80: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 55

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92 + 40% × 77.9 = 86

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza GR80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 5 +38
    89
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza GR80Pilot Sport 5
    Reviews found online5189
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza GR80Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests–63
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Turanza GR80 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza GR80Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Relative Score 58 90
Dry 56 92
Wet 63 94
Comfort 62 78
Noise – 47
Treadwear 55 86
Handling (owners) 51 89
Efficiency – 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Turanza GR80

± 4

Pilot Sport 5

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza GR80

Pros

  • High initial performance satisfaction reported by some users
  • Positive overall driving experience for select owners

Cons

  • Premature tread wear occurring well before expected service life
  • Poor long-term grip performance after two years of use
  • Susceptibility to sidewall nicks and air leakage on rough road surfaces
All owner themes in the Turanza GR80 review

Tire B Pilot Sport 5

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and dry traction with high resistance to aquaplaning
  • Superior tread life and longevity compared to competitors and previous generations
  • Noticeable improvements in ride comfort and a quieter cabin over rough road surfaces

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to initial steering vagueness or understeer during hard cornering
  • Higher price point compared to some tier-one competitors
  • Performance and grip degrade significantly under intense track heat or heavy circuit use
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 5 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Turanza GR80

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its outstanding wet grip, daily driving comfort, and impressive tread life. While widely recommended as a dependable, premium all-round performance tire, some enthusiasts criticize it for having a slightly numb steering feel, softer sidewalls, and poor heat resistance during track use compared to more aggressive alternatives.

r/kereta ·9 upvotes ·2025-12-15

“Have to replace my tyres soon, MC7 or PS5? Hi guys, I need to replace the tyres on my civic soon and I’m stuck between the MC7 and the PS5. I not a guy who will driving 180km/h in raining day so i think both performance is good enough for me. I did some research, it seems like MC7 have better performance overall. Also found that MC7 is cheaper than PS5 in my country (around RM600-700 cheaper for 4 tyres). I prefer tread life > noise/ comfort > performance (rarely drive over 120). Any feedback on the 2 brands would be super helpful. Thanks! === UPDATED === Thank you all for suggestions and opinions. So at the end i pick the MC7. Reasons: It’s possibly quieter compared to the PS5 The price is cheaper and come with 1 year premium (or what name i forgot) warranty There’s a Continental authorized dealer near my place I’ve never tried Continental before, so I decided to give it a try At the moment, the driving experience is a bit quieter than the previous PS4 (which is expected since it’s a new tire). As for performance, I haven’t really pushed it to the limit, but it’s more than sufficient for me, didn’t experience any wheel spin or loss of traction so far. One thing I do notice is that I can constantly hear small stones sticking to the tire and hitting the wheel arch which is very annoying. Also, on a personal note, I still prefer the sidewall shape of the PS5, so it took me some time to get used to the rounded sidewall of the MC7 Read more”

r/CarTrackDays ·17 upvotes ·2025-05-25

“Michelin PS5 Delaminating Near new PS5, running a low speed track, and the fronts basically fell apart after 2 sessions. I know these aren't track-focussed tires, but is this really expected for them? Looks like the tires got too hot, but I'm just shocked how poorly they performed on a stock car (Golf R). Not sure if it's worth contacting Michelin over this or not. Read more”

bimmerforums.co.uk ·1 upvote ·2024-05-06

“look at camskill,always the cheapest,ive just gotten the michelin ps5 for my M4 ,not fitted yet as my conti sport 7 still have life,only bought last month as there was a cashback offer from michelin at camskill,i got £80 so got 2 x 275-35-19 and x2 255-35-19 for £617 delivered,”

Top themes
#wet grip performance#tread life longevity#daily driving comfort#track heat delamination#premium pricing comparisons#road noise levels#steering feel feedback

Based on 173 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza GR80 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—66
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
UTQG—320 - 340 A - B A

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza GR80

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Turanza GR80 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 92 vs 56 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 94 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 86 vs 55 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza GR80
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Turanza GR80 or Pilot Sport 5?

Which is better in the wet, Turanza GR80 or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 94 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza GR80 or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 92 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Turanza GR80 or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 78 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Turanza GR80 or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 86 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology