Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard vs Falken ZE912 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 3 + 200 owner reviews. How we score

Turanza T005 Driveguard is ahead, 74–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE912
Tire BFalken

ZE912

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews

“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Turanza T005 Driveguard +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005 DriveguardZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7665

    Turanza T005 Driveguard: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 73

    ZE912: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Turanza T005 Driveguard. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 78

    Wet

    Turanza T005 Driveguard +10
    68
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005 DriveguardZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online8167

    Turanza T005 Driveguard: 60% × 76 (est.) + 40% × 80.8 = 78

    ZE912: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Turanza T005 Driveguard. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 72

    Comfort

    Turanza T005 Driveguard +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005 DriveguardZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7566

    Turanza T005 Driveguard: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 72

    ZE912: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Turanza T005 Driveguard or ZE912. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 69

    Treadwear

    Turanza T005 Driveguard +6
    63
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005 DriveguardZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7260

    Turanza T005 Driveguard: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 69

    ZE912: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza T005 Driveguard. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 79

    Handling (owners)

    Turanza T005 Driveguard +16
    63
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005 DriveguardZE912
    Reviews found online7963
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard vs Falken ZE912: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza T005 DriveguardFalken ZE912
Relative Score 74 66
Dry 73 66
Wet 78 68
Comfort 72 68
Treadwear 69 63
Handling (owners) 79 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Turanza T005 Driveguard

ZE912

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza T005 Driveguard

Pros

  • Low road noise levels contributing to a quieter cabin experience
  • Effective Driveguard run-flat technology providing peace of mind and sidewall stability
  • Improved handling responsiveness and traction compared to budget alternatives

Cons

  • Mixed performance in wet conditions, with some users reporting a lack of grip under acceleration
  • Accelerated wear reported by certain drivers, falling short of high mileage expectations
  • Susceptibility to shoulder wear under aggressive driving conditions
All owner themes in the Turanza T005 Driveguard review

Tire B ZE912

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
  • Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
All owner themes in the ZE912 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken ZE912

Mixed

Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.

Top themes
#affordable pricing and value#quiet and comfortable ride#poor snow and winter performance#noise level over time#treadwear and longevity#sidewall stiffness and handling#wet road traction

Based on 50 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard B · Falken ZE912
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available25—
Rim diameters16″ – 19″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard

Falken ZE912

Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard scores 79 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard scores 78 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard scores 73 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard scores 69 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard
Tire B · Falken ZE912

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Turanza T005 Driveguard or ZE912?

Which is better in the wet, Turanza T005 Driveguard or ZE912?

Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard, 78 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza T005 Driveguard or ZE912?

Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard, 73 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Turanza T005 Driveguard or ZE912?

Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Turanza T005 Driveguard or ZE912?

Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard, 69 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology