Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 13 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 19 road tests and 13 + 3,382 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus S1 evo3 is ahead, 70–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 19 tests Owners 57 · 3,382 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Ventus S1 evo3 +1575Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 55 60 Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.6 + 40% × 59.8 = 75
No road tests of dry for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
63
Wet
Ventus S1 evo3 +1881Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 90 Reviews found online 61 68 Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 89.6 + 40% × 67.9 = 81
No road tests of wet for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
52
Comfort
Ventus S1 evo3 +759Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 45 56 Turanza T005 RFT: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 44.5 = 52
Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.3 + 60% × 55.6 = 59
No road tests of comfort for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 77 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
50
Treadwear
Ventus S1 evo3 +353Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 57 (est.) 61 Reviews found online 39 42 Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 50
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.8 + 40% × 41.5 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
55
Handling (owners)
Ventus S1 evo3 +459Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Ventus S1 evo3 Reviews found online 55 59 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison68Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests – 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 70 |
| Dry | 60 | 75 |
| Wet | 63 | 81 |
| Comfort | 52 | 59 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 59 |
| Efficiency | – | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Turanza T005 RFT
Ventus S1 evo3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza T005 RFT
Pros
- Commendable initial ride comfort for a run-flat tire
- Responsive and direct steering feedback
- Strong dry and wet braking performance
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Susceptibility to structural damage and bulges from road impacts
Tire B Ventus S1 evo3
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
- Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.
“My thoughts with the Hankooks on my '25R vs the Bridgestones on my '23R. Hankooks WAY louder but better ride quality & traction. As far as rotating - I rotate at least every two weeks (off before AutoX and on immediately after - I have dedicated AutoX tires ). I don't even pay attention to what position they're in. Zero issues.”
“That would tally with what this person found with the 127 variant that preceded it “Hi just for information,I asked Hankook what tread depth when new was on their Ventus S1 Evo 3 K127 tyre, the reply was 6.6 mm””
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 110 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 - 420 A - AA A |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 81 vs 63 on wet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 75 vs 60 on dry.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 59 vs 52 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 53 vs 50 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza T005 RFT or Ventus S1 evo3?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza T005 RFT or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 81 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza T005 RFT or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 75 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza T005 RFT or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 59 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza T005 RFT or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 53 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology