Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 13 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Advan Sport V105S is ahead, 71–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 425 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Advan Sport V105S +672Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Advan Sport V105S Reviews found online 65 75 -
68
Wet
Advan Sport V105S +775Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Advan Sport V105S Reviews found online 67 76 -
62
Comfort
Advan Sport V105S +668Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Advan Sport V105S Reviews found online 56 67 -
56
Treadwear
Advan Sport V105S +965Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Advan Sport V105S Reviews found online 48 65 -
64
Handling
Advan Sport V105S +872Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Advan Sport V105S Reviews found online 64 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT | Yokohama Advan Sport V105S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 71 |
| Dry | 66 | 72 |
| Wet | 68 | 75 |
| Comfort | 62 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 65 |
| Handling | 64 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Turanza T005 RFT
Advan Sport V105S
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza T005 RFT
Pros
- Commendable initial ride comfort for a run-flat tire
- Responsive and direct steering feedback
- Strong dry and wet braking performance
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Susceptibility to structural damage and bulges from road impacts
Tire B Advan Sport V105S
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
- Exceptional wet weather performance and resistance to aquaplaning
- Stiff sidewalls providing sharp steering response and direct feedback
Cons
- Shorter tread life or faster-than-average wear noted by some users
- Stiffer sidewall results in a firmer, less plush ride quality
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on vehicle and road surface
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT | B · Yokohama Advan Sport V105S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S
Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport V105S — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 65 vs 56 on treadwear.
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 72 vs 64 on handling.
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 75 vs 68 on wet.
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 72 vs 66 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.