Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 13 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 425 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Sport V105S is ahead, 73–58
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 425 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Advan Sport V105S +1474Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Advan Sport V105S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 56 77 Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60
Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
No road tests of dry for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Advan Sport V105S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
64
Wet
Advan Sport V105S +1377Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Advan Sport V105S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 61 79 Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64
Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 77
No road tests of wet for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Advan Sport V105S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Comfort
Advan Sport V105S +1568Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Advan Sport V105S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 45 67 Turanza T005 RFT: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 45.4 = 53
Advan Sport V105S: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.1 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Turanza T005 RFT or Advan Sport V105S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
50
Treadwear
Advan Sport V105S +1666Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Advan Sport V105S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 39 65 Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 39.2 = 50
Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Sport V105S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
55
Handling (owners)
Advan Sport V105S +1772Why this score
Source Turanza T005 RFT Advan Sport V105S Reviews found online 55 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT | Yokohama Advan Sport V105S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 73 |
| Dry | 60 | 74 |
| Wet | 64 | 77 |
| Comfort | 53 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
58
/ 100
Turanza T005 RFT
73
/ 100
Advan Sport V105S
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza T005 RFT
Pros
- Commendable initial ride comfort for a run-flat tire
- Responsive and direct steering feedback
- Strong dry and wet braking performance
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Susceptibility to structural damage and bulges from road impacts
Tire B Advan Sport V105S
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
- Exceptional wet weather performance and resistance to aquaplaning
- Stiff sidewalls providing sharp steering response and direct feedback
Cons
- Shorter tread life or faster-than-average wear noted by some users
- Stiffer sidewall results in a firmer, less plush ride quality
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on vehicle and road surface
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT | B · Yokohama Advan Sport V105S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
58
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
73
/ 100
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S
Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport V105S — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 72 vs 55 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 66 vs 50 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 68 vs 53 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 74 vs 60 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport V105S
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza T005 RFT or Advan Sport V105S?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza T005 RFT or Advan Sport V105S?
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S, 77 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza T005 RFT or Advan Sport V105S?
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S, 74 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza T005 RFT or Advan Sport V105S?
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S, 68 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza T005 RFT or Advan Sport V105S?
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S, 66 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology