Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 13 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth XT AE61 is ahead, 72–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth XT AE61

Summer

± 8

Tests 65 · 2 tests Owners 80 · 12 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 EV Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    BluEarth XT AE61 +15
    75
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005 RFTBluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 63 (est.)70
    Reviews found online5583

    Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 83.4 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 63

    Wet

    BluEarth XT AE61 +11
    74
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005 RFTBluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 65 (est.)67
    Reviews found online6183

    Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 67.4 + 40% × 83.3 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 52

    Comfort

    BluEarth XT AE61 +15
    67
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005 RFTBluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 64 (est.)64
    Reviews found online4569

    Turanza T005 RFT: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 44.5 = 52

    BluEarth XT AE61: 40% × 64.4 + 60% × 69.2 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    78
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005 RFTBluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–86
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 78

    No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth XT AE61. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 50

    Treadwear

    BluEarth XT AE61 +13
    63
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005 RFTBluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 57 (est.)53
    Reviews found online3977

    Turanza T005 RFT: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 50

    BluEarth XT AE61: 60% × 53.3 + 40% × 77 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza T005 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 55

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth XT AE61 +27
    82
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005 RFTBluEarth XT AE61
    Reviews found online5582
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza T005 RFTBluEarth XT AE61
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–65
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza T005 RFTYokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Relative Score 58 72
Dry 60 75
Wet 63 74
Comfort 52 67
Noise – 78
Treadwear 50 63
Handling (owners) 55 82
Efficiency – 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Turanza T005 RFT

± 8

BluEarth XT AE61

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza T005 RFT

Pros

  • Commendable initial ride comfort for a run-flat tire
  • Responsive and direct steering feedback
  • Strong dry and wet braking performance

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire wears
  • Susceptibility to structural damage and bulges from road impacts
All owner themes in the Turanza T005 RFT review

Tire B BluEarth XT AE61

Pros

  • Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Responsive and sharp steering handling
  • High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction

Cons

  • Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
  • Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
  • Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
All owner themes in the BluEarth XT AE61 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—38
Rim diameters—16″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 82 vs 55 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 75 vs 60 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 67 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 63 vs 50 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Turanza T005 RFT or BluEarth XT AE61?

Which is better in the wet, Turanza T005 RFT or BluEarth XT AE61?

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61, 74 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza T005 RFT or BluEarth XT AE61?

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61, 75 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Turanza T005 RFT or BluEarth XT AE61?

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61, 67 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Turanza T005 RFT or BluEarth XT AE61?

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61, 63 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology