tirewheelguide

Yokohama S306 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Yokohama S306 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 28 + 0 road tests and 2,363 + 17 owner reviews. How we score

AllSeasonContact is ahead, 73–58

Check price on Amazon · AllSeasonContact or S306 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental AllSeasonContact
Tire AContinental

AllSeasonContact

All Season

± 4

Tests 76 · 28 tests Owners 69 · 2,363 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (wet handling)

“Originally Posted By: UG_Passat .... Nexen beats out Michelin, Continental, Goodyear and Nokian Surprise loser, is Michelin. Test winner: Nexen N blue 4 Season To solve the goal conflicts succeeds in the test the Nexen N blue 4 Season best. With good performances on wet and ice, the Korean tire on dry and snow-covered road is a bit weaker, but still acceptable. The new AllSeasonContact from Conti , on the other hand, solves the classic conflict of objectives of wetness vs. Snow very well - but at the expense of performance on dry roads. On dry land, the next-ranked Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 and Nokian Wheatherproof are also showing weaknesses. With the exception of the Firestone (worst dry and wet performance), all tires behind it ride on snow only below average - even the most expensive model in the test, the low- wear CrossClimate from Michelin LOL, I am waiting 25 years for ADAC to test tires after 20k. This is not first time ADAC has "surprise" winner.”

Yokohama S306
Tire BYokohama

S306

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 17 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    AllSeasonContact +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactS306
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / – tests69≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6657

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 66 = 68

    S306: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 61

    No road tests of dry for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 83

    Wet

    AllSeasonContact +27
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactS306
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / – tests87≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7651

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 87.3 + 40% × 75.8 = 83

    S306: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 50.9 = 56

    No road tests of wet for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).

  3. 81

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactS306
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / – tests89–
    Reviews found online71–

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 70.9 = 81

  4. 70

    Comfort

    AllSeasonContact +15
    55
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactS306
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests71≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6948

    AllSeasonContact: 40% × 71.4 + 60% × 69.2 = 70

    S306: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 47.6 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for S306. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 63

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactS306
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / – tests61–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 61 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 63

    No owner ratings of noise for AllSeasonContact. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    AllSeasonContact +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactS306
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests71≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6557

    AllSeasonContact: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 64.7 = 68

    S306: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    AllSeasonContact +23
    49
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactS306
    Reviews found online7249
  8. 88

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContactS306
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests88–
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental AllSeasonContactYokohama S306
Relative Score 73 58
Dry 68 61
Wet 83 56
Snow 81 –
Comfort 70 55
Noise 63 –
Treadwear 68 61
Handling (owners) 72 49
Efficiency 88 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

AllSeasonContact

± 8

S306

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AllSeasonContact

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and snow traction
  • Predictable and stable handling characteristics
  • High level of ride comfort and cabin refinement

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear in high-temperature summer conditions
  • Occasional reports of road noise or specific frequency whining
  • Mixed feedback on dry-road performance during extreme heat
All owner themes in the AllSeasonContact review

Tire B S306

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather grip and handling
  • High tread longevity and durability
  • Stiff sidewall provides good steering feedback

Cons

  • Consistently poor wet weather traction
  • Harsh ride quality and high road noise
  • Tendency to tramline on uneven surfaces
All owner themes in the S306 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental AllSeasonContact

Mixed

Community opinion on the Continental AllSeasonContact is generally positive regarding its winter and wet weather performance, but mixed when it comes to noise, ride harshness, and wear characteristics. Users appreciate its strong snow and rain capabilities compared to competitors, though some note drawbacks such as increased road noise or stiffness over time, particularly for XL-rated variants. Additionally, availability is primarily focused in Europe, making it a well-regarded option overseas while being largely absent in North America.

r/AutomobileRO ·1 upvote ·2025-05-26

“Ai presupune ca au remediat sau imbunatatit ceva la allseason 2 dar exact acelasi tip de uzura am observat si eu la Continental Allseason Contact 1. Nu le-am luat din magazin, le-am luat de la cineva care pretinde ca au fost folosite maxim 2000km, aveau DOT sfarsit de 2022 si adancime profil 6.5-7mm. N-am fost atent daca erau asa de cand le-am luat poate daca observam le evitam, dar dupa nici 2 luni de folosire (sub 1000km) cand am verificat presiunea din roti cu o ocazie am observat si eu exact acelas tip de uzura. Am zis ca iau continental ca-s mai premium si n-am treaba multi ani, pentru ca si asa fac sub 6000km pe an. Daca stiam mai puneam cateva sute de lei si luam hankook sau nexen cu DOT 2024.”
r/TyreReviews ·6 upvotes ·2025-12-08

“Conti allseason contact harsh and noisy”
r/dkbiler ·2 upvotes ·2026-02-11

“Jeg har kørt udenmærket på dem på denne vej i min yaris, så længe jeg kører efter forholdene. Sad dog fast i dyb sne ved min indkørsel, som jeg burde have skovlet. Jeg skovlede den fri med 4-5 spader, og kørte så videre uden problemer. Ellers kun mistet grebet én gang på sort is med for meget fart. (kun slinger kørsel omrking 100m, fik kontrol igen). Edit: jeg ser lige at det er Continental AllSeasonContact jeg har, ikke 2.”
Top themes
#Winter and snow grip#Wet weather performance#Noise and ride comfort#Tread wear and durability#Comparison with competitors#Regional availability

Based on 15 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama S306

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental AllSeasonContact B · Yokohama S306
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available108—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental AllSeasonContact

Yokohama S306

Winner: Continental AllSeasonContact — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama S306 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 83 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 72 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 70 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental AllSeasonContact scores 68 vs 61 on dry.

Tire A · Continental AllSeasonContact
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama S306
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AllSeasonContact or S306?

Which is better in the wet, AllSeasonContact or S306?

Continental AllSeasonContact, 83 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, AllSeasonContact or S306?

Continental AllSeasonContact, 68 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, AllSeasonContact or S306?

Continental AllSeasonContact, 70 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, AllSeasonContact or S306?

Continental AllSeasonContact, 68 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology